FDA Issues New Draft Guidance On Testing Medical Devices For Use In MRIs

New federal draft guidance details how to determine whether medical devices and implants can safely enter a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine, which may expose the devices to powerful magnetic fields that could dangerously interact with metal and electrical systems in patients’ bodies.

The FDA draft guidance was issued earlier this month, titled โ€œTesting and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment,โ€ providing information about medical devices that are intended to enter the MR environment, such as pacemakers, neurostimulators, insulin pumps, artificial heart valves, and cochlear implants.

Traditionally, many medical devices and implants cannot enter a MRI machine, because they are metallic and can cause abnormalities to the images or potentially harm the patient. However, manufacturers have begun designing versions of medical devices that are MRI compatible. Nearly 70% of pacemakers implanted in 2018 were MRI-compatible up from 12% in 2016.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The draft guidance details how to undertake testing to assess the safety and compatibility of medical devices in the MR environment and the recommended format for magnetic resonance imaging. ย The guidance also includes improvements to safety of MR environments and MRI related medical device labeling.

The draft guidance reviews hazards linked to medical devices brought into the MRI including magnetic induced displacement force, magnetic induced torque, and heating of tissue near the medical device.

Medical devices entering the MR environment can have a direct impact on how providers diagnose and treat patients. Having active medical devices can cause the images to be corrupted, it can lead to images that canโ€™t be interpreted or lead to a diagnosis, and can cause disease-mimicking artifacts, or fake items on the images.

The FDA guidance called for this hazard to be addressed for all medical devices which will be allowed to enter the MRI machine. The agency indicates manufacturers should include summaries of their test reports. The hazard being tested and the equipment should also be listed.

The devices should also include safety labeling, indicating the device is โ€œMR Safe,โ€ โ€œMR Unsafe,โ€ or โ€œMR Conditionalโ€ to indicate if they can be brought into the MR environment, should remain outside, or have special guidance for use in the MRI machine, the draft guidance states.

Public comments on the draft guidance will be accepted until Oct 1, 2019. Comments can be submitted online, or by mail to Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

All written comments must be identified with docket number FDA-2019-D-2837.

Martha Garcia
Written by: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuit alleges Olympus failed to address known problems with sterilizing duodenoscopes, leading to a fatal ERCP infection years after federal regulators first raised concerns about the devices.
Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.