Skip Navigation

NutriBullet 900 Blender Lawsuit Alleges Exploding Container Caused Permanent Hand Injury

NutriBullet 900 Blender Lawsuit Alleges Exploding Container Caused Permanent Hand Injury

An Alabama woman has filed a product liability lawsuit alleging she suffered severe lacerations, nerve damage and permanent disability after a NutriBullet blending cup violently separated from the base.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Melinda D. Harmon and Edward C. Harmon, III in Alabama Circuit Court on August 5, naming Capital Brands Group Inc., Capital Brands LLC, Capital Brands Distribution LLC, Homeland Housewares LLC and NutriBullet LLC as defendants. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama on September 4.

Kitchen Appliance Injury Lawsuits

NutriBullet blenders use a compact blending cup that twists onto a blade assembly before being placed onto the powered base. Unlike a traditional countertop blender, the blades and cup are removed together after blending, placing the user in close proximity to the blade assembly when separating the components.

Harmon’s lawsuit alleges the NutriBullet was defectively designed because the blending cup could violently separate from the base during use, exposing her hand to the rapidly spinning blades.

Similar NutriBullet lawsuits have raised concerns about unexpected separation or pressure buildup during operation, which may cause blender components, hot liquids or other contents to be forcefully ejected.

In addition, a broader series of pressure cooker lawsuits involving Ninja Foodi, Instant Pot, Crock-Pot and other appliances have likewise alleged failures involving safety mechanisms intended to prevent lids from being opened while contents remain pressurized. Those lawsuits claim premature lid openings can release scalding food, liquid and steam onto users.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

NutriBullet Injury Allegations

According to the complaint, Harmon was using the NutriBullet 900 Series blender to blend food ingredients on August 15, 2025, when the cylinder separated from the base and exploded violently toward her.

As a result of the separation, the cutting blades were allegedly exposed, spinning at a high speed, striking Harmon’s hand and causing a seven-centimeter laceration.

Harmon claims she required emergency care as well as extensive medical treatment, undergoing orthopedic surgical intervention, scar revision and prolonged physical therapy. She says she suffered lacerations, nerve damage, painful scar tissue and permanent physical impairment of her right hand, including functional limitation and weakness.

The lawsuit alleges the NutriBullet blender suffers from design defects, including a lack of adequate engineering safeguards. It indicates the device’s interlock mechanism is what automatically shuts off the blending cylinder’s motor when it is loosened or detached from the base. Without this feature, the blades continue to spin when the cylinder is separated, which is what allegedly caused Harmon’s injuries.

In addition, Harmon argues that the NutriBullet lacked adequate safety warnings to alert her of the risk that the cylinder and base could separate while the blender is being used.

“The defendants, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, from a long and well-documented history of substantially similar incidents involving NutriBullet blenders, that the design of the subject blender permitted the blending cylinder to violently separate from the base during ordinary operation while the blades remained rotating and exposed to the user and that this defect posed a serious and unreasonable risk of severe bodily injury to ordinary consumers.”

Melinda D. Harmon et al. v. Capital Brands Group Inc. et al.

The complaint raises allegations of violation of the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine, negligence, wantonness and loss of consortium. It is seeking compensation for physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, permanent physical impairment and disfigurement, past and future medical expenses, past and future lost wages and diminished earning capacity, loss of enjoyment of life and other injuries and damages.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Martha Garcia
Written By: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.

About the writer

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.