Skip Navigation

NutriBullet Blender Explosion Lawsuit Filed Over Dangerous Design Defects

NutriBullet Blender Explosion Lawsuit Filed Over Dangerous Design Defects

A Kansas woman suffered severe injuries while using a defective NutriBullet blender, according to allegations raised in a product liability lawsuit that indicates the device should have been built to safely operate for years.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Cristal Herrera in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas on November 6, naming Capital Brands LLC, Capital Brands Distribution LLC, NutriBullet LLC, NutriLiving LLC and Homeland Housewares LLC as defendants.

The NutriBullet is a compact personal blender, originally marketed as the “Magic Bullet,” and designed with a high-powered motor and specialized blades to blend fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds into smoothies.

In recent years, however, the small personal blenders have come under growing scrutiny amid a wave of NutriBullet lawsuits alleging the devices can explode during use, propelling sharp plastic pieces, metal blades, and even scalding liquid onto consumers. Similar claims have also been raised in Ninja Nutri blender lawsuits, which allegedly suffer from design flaws that fail to account for the buildup of heat and pressure during normal operation.

These incidents highlight a broader pattern of safety concerns involving common household appliances. Many of the same allegations have surfaced in pressure cooker lawsuits against brands such as Ninja Foodi, Instant Pot and Crock Pot, which claim that faulty lid-locking mechanisms can cause the lids to open while contents are still pressurized, resulting in scalding food explosions and serious burn injuries.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

In her lawsuit, Herrera claims she was using her NutriBullet blender on November 8, 2023, to prepare chili salsa when the cup suddenly detached from the blade assembly, causing scalding hot contents to spray across her face, neck, chest and left arm. The incident allegedly left her with severe burns to those areas.

The complaint points to several design defects that made the NutriBullet dangerously unstable during normal use. Herrera alleges that the blender’s powerful motor can generate enough heat and pressure to cause the container to separate from its base, ejecting hot contents without warning. 

The lawsuit also claims the device lacks critical safety features, such as a pressure-release valve, thermal cutoff and adequate warnings, which could prevent the buildup of steam and pressure inside the sealed cup.

As a result of the explosion, Herrera claims that the defective NutriBullet product did not work as it was marketed or intended. 

In particular, the complaint indicates that the manufacturer designed the NutriBullet to last for multiple years. However, Herrera’s particular device had yet to reach the end of its “useful life,” when it malfunctioned, exploded, and caused her injuries.

“The subject Nutribullet blender was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left defendants’ possession because it could overheat and pressurize its contents to a dangerous level during ordinary use.”

Cristal Herrera v. Capital Brands LLC et al

Herrera’s lawsuit further accuses the manufacturers of knowingly putting consumers at risk by ignoring a history of similar explosions involving NutriBullet and Magic Bullet devices. 

According to the filing, the companies were aware of multiple reports of users suffering burns from pressurized contents but continued selling the blenders without design changes, recalls or adequate warnings. The allegations contend that this pattern of inaction demonstrates a reckless disregard for consumer safety.

Herrera raises allegations of strict liability, negligence and breach of implied warranty against all of the defendants. She is seeking punitive damages.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Image Credit: Shutterstock.com / daily_creativity
Written By: Michael Adams

Senior Editor & Journalist

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial.
As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL.

About the writer

Michael Adams

Michael Adams

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.