Oppenheimer Lawsuit Filed by Oregon Over Mutual Fund Losses

The State of Oregon has filed a $36.2 million lawsuit against OppenheimerFunds, Inc., seeking to recover losses caused by the collapse of the Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund.

The state’s Oppenheimer lawsuit joins similar class action suits and claims filed by investors who allege that misrepresentations were made about the risk associated different mutual funds offered by Oppenheimer.

The Oregon lawsuit involves losses in the Oregon College Savings Plan and the OppenheimerFunds 529 Plan. The attorney general and treasurer of Oregon allege that Oppenheimer distorted the facts about their bond funds, claiming that they were conservative investments for the state, when in reality the money was in a high-risk hedge fund-like vehicle.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

OppenheimerFunds, Inc., is accused of making inappropriate bond investments, resulting in massive losses for the Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund during the market downturn late last year.

Similar Oppenheimer lawsuits and arbitration claims have been filed over losses in the Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund, which is a high-yield bond fund offered by the firm to individual investors.

Starting in July 2008, the value of the Oppenheimer Champion income Fund began to decline as the credit markets fell apart. When Lehman Brothers and AIG collapsed in September 2008, the value of the fund’s shares fell even further, ending the year with losses of 78% in 2008.

In February 2009, an Oppenheimer class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which seeks to represent all investors who purchased shares between January 26, 2007 and December 6, 2008. The Oppenheimer lawsuit alleges that the firm failed to adhere to the stated objective of not taking any undue risk, failed to have adequate controls in place to prevent excessive risk and failed to disclose the extent of the risk posed by investment in the bond fund.

A number of individual investors have also filed arbitration claims over Oppenheimer mutual fund losses through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged”
Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged” (Posted today)

The Bard hernia mesh lawsuit has been pending for years in the federal MDL, where family indicates global settlement negotiations have stalled, leading to a request to allow their claim to be remanded for trial.

AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs
AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs (Posted yesterday)

Lawsuit blames PFAS manufacturers for failing to prevent water contamination by their chemicals, or warn municipalities and the public about the potential risks of ulcerative colitis and other diseases as a result of exposure.

Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria
Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria (Posted 2 days ago)

Hundreds of currently pending Bard PowerPort lawsuits over infections, fractures and migration injuries were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), but now even more claims present similar allegations that the implantable port catheter system has dangerous design defects that were not adequately disclosed by the manufacturer.