Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
St. Jude Optisure Defibrillator Lead Recall Issued Over Insulation Problems January 26, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsSeveral hundred St. Jude Optisure defibrillation leads are being recalled, due to a risk that the insulation may be defective and cause individuals to suffer unnecessary shocks to the heart.ย The Optisure Dual Coil Defibrillation Lead recall was announced by the FDA on January 21, after it was discovered that the small wires used to connect implantable cardiac defibrillators to the heart may have been compromised during the manufacturing process. This could result in cuts in the insulation layer of the shock coils.St. Jude Medical originally sent a Medical Device Advisory letter to doctors in November 2015, warning about the risk of problems, indicating that a trim technique used to remove excess medical adhesive may have damaged the insulation around the SVC shock coils.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe leads are designed to monitor the heart rhythms and deliver electric shocks if needed to restore normal heart beats. However, insulation problems may cause the device to fail when it is needed or to deliver unnecessary shocks.The recall impacts approximately 447 St. Jude Optisure Dual Coil Defibrillation Leads, with model numbers LDA220, LDA220Q, LDA230Q, and LDP220Q. The leads were sold worldwide, with about 281 sold in the U.S.The leads were manufactured by St. Jude Medical’s Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, located in Sylmar, California.Doctors have been instructed to contact their local Sales Representative or St. Judge Medical Technical Services at (800) 722-3774 with any questions.The recall comes nearly a year after St. Jude agreed to pay $64.3 million to settle lawsuits over insulation problems with Riata lead defibrillators.About 227,000 of the Riata lead wires were sold worldwide before the manufacturer acknowledged that the insulation surrounding the wire may be prone to decay and erode, leaving exposed wires inside patients. This has caused many users to experience unnecessary shocks, or for the defibrillator to fail.In late 2010, St. Jude removed the leads from the market amid reports of insulation failure, and a warning letter was sent to doctors about the risk of problems in late 2011, which the FDA classified as aย St. Jude Riata recall. However, it is estimated that nearly 80,000 of the leads remain active in patients in the United States, as the process of attempting to remove the lead is risky and doctors often recommend keeping the defective lead in place unless there is evidence that it has failed. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Defibrillator Lead, ICD, Optisure, St. JudeMore St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit Stories Leadless Pacemakers May Have Lower Complications Rates: Study October 20, 2021 1 Comments Paul November 11, 2021 I have had one of these leads in since Apr. 2014. Over the years it has slowly been deteriorating. Less than 8 years now they want to replace my rv-lead 220Q/65. But they want to leave it adandon inside of me and replace with a new one. It seems complicated to remove because of scar tissue to the sides of the vein. Maybe laser removal. One ever told me why the recall was in affect. They just kept telling me it is still working. What the ______ FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: yesterday)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026) Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 2 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago)A man who became paralyzed has filed an Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit after the original device failed, causing him to suffer electric shocks.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (05/13/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)
Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: yesterday)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026)
Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 2 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago)A man who became paralyzed has filed an Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit after the original device failed, causing him to suffer electric shocks.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (05/13/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)