Parietex Hernia Mesh Prone To Unravel and Fail, Lawsuit Claims

|

A South Carolina man has filed a product liability lawsuit over hernia mesh complications associated with Covidien Parietex TET Mesh, which allegedly began unraveling in his body.

Michael Hamby filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 15, naming Covidien LP and Medtronic, Inc., who developed the hernia patch, as defendants.

According to the lawsuit, Hamby underwent hernia repair surgery in July 2013, at which time he received a Parietex TET Mesh implant. However, the complaint indicates that the design is unreasonably dangerous and defective, which led to Hamby suffering scarring, pain, hernia recurrence and the need for additional surgery.

Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.
Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.

The lawsuit raises claims that are similar to other Covidien Parietex mesh lawsuits, indicating that the design makes the patch prone to unravel inside the body, resulting in its fibers migrating and causing inflammatory responses. It can also contract over time, according to the lawsuit, causing tension on tacks and sutures that result in tearing.

“Covidien and Medtronic knew or should have known that Parietex TET Mesh was not a safe and effective treatment for hernias,” the lawsuit states. “Covidien and Medtronic also knew and should have known that Parietex TET Mesh was considerably more harmful and inadequate than other meshes or methods for hernia repair.”

The complaint indicates that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about risks that Parietex mesh may fail, claioming that it was defectively designed and manufactured.

The case joins a growing hernia mesh litigation being pursued against multiple manufacturers, each involving similar problems with the designs of products that have been widely used by surgeons throughout the U.S. over the past decade.

In addition to other Covidien Parietex mesh claims, there are also a number of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits, Atrium C-Qur lawsuits and Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits pending nationwide, leading to the federal court system to establish three separate centralized pre-trial proceedings for litigation involving those products. However, there is currently no consolidated proceeding for the Covidien mesh lawsuits.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has set key scheduling deadlines for the four first bellwether trials over claims that BioZorb breast markers are defectively designed.
Parties in federal Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits seek closer coordination with Delaware and New York state courts, proposing a synchronization of general causation schedules.
As sports-betting apps like DraftKings and FanDuel grow in popularity, treatment providers nationwide are reporting a surge in young adults seeking help for gambling addiction fueled by targeted algorithms, brain chemistry and aggressive marketing.