Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Chemical Lobbying Group Files Lawsuit Over New EPA Advisory Levels for PFAS in Drinking WaterAmerican Chemistry Council claims the EPA did not follow its own scientific standards when setting the new PFAS water advisory levels for safe amounts of “forever chemicals”. August 3, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA lobbying group for the chemicals industry has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in an effort to reverse a decision that lowers the safe levels of PFAS chemicals in water before a health advisory is issued.Toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as โforever chemicalsโ since they are known to persist in the environment and build up in the human body, have been used in a variety of consumer products and packaging in recent years. However, there are increasing concerns about unsafe levels of PFAS in drinking water, much of which has come from use of the chemicals in firefighting foam commonly used on military bases, airports and fire training facilities.The American Chemistry Council (ACC) filed a petition for review (PDF) in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on July 29, indicating that the EPAโs issuance of new lifetime health advisory levels for the PFAS chemicals known as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), was โscientifically flawed.โPFOA and PFOS are two of the most studied, and two of the most toxic, of the family of chemicals known as PFAS. In June, the EPA set new PFAS drinking water advisory levels for four PFAS chemicals, including PFOA and PFOS.The EPA made the decision after its own researchers determined โnegative health effectsโ could occur with concentrations in water at or near zero, and below the EPAโs ability to detect at this time. In response, the agency has set a health advisory level of .004 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and 0.02 ppt for PFOS.The move comes amid concerns raised in a growing number ofย PFAS water contamination lawsuits now being filed by individuals diagnosed with cancer or ulcerative colitis after drinking water known to contain high levels of the chemicals. Chemical and fire safety equipment manufacturers also face hundreds of lawsuits brought by former firefighters who developed testicular cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and other injuries after direct exposure to the chemicals in firefighting foam.Firefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFirefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe ACC claims that even though the new guidelines outline โnon-regulatory levels,โ the EPAโs Lifetime Health Advisories (LHAs) will have sweeping policy implications at the state and federal level, and claim the agency failed to follow its own scientific practices.โThe Agencyโs revised LHAs for PFOA and PFOS are based on toxicity assessments that are currently being reviewed by EPAโs Science Advisory Board. Rather than wait for the outcome of this peer review, EPA has announced new Advisories that are 3,000 to 17,000 times lower than those released by the Obama Administration in 2016,โ according to an ACC statement released on June 30. โThese new levels are below levels that can be reliably detected using existing EPA methods.โThe ACC is asking the appeals court to overturn the EPA decision, claiming the new LHAs are already having an effect on statesโ laws and practices, even though they are currently considered interim levels.The ACC complains that the EPA is urging states and municipal water authorities to take action to fight levels of PFAS the agency now feels are harmful to human health.Widespread Concerns Over PFAS in Drinking WaterPFAS were first introduced into the manufacturing industry in the 1940โs and were popularly used because of their ability to resist heat, grease, stains, and water. They are found in a range of consumer products, ranging from nonstick cooking pans to fast food wrappers.One of the largest uses of PFAS chemicals has been from aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), commonly used by the military and firefighting organizations throughout the country. Currently, 3M Company and other chemical manufacturers are facing a growing number ofย firefighter cancer lawsuitsย seeking financial compensation and settlement benefits for injuries which may have been avoided if warnings and safety recommendations had been provided about the harmful long term side effects of PFAS exposure.As of October 2021, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has identified 2,854 locations in the U.S. that have PFAS in drinking water supplies. Of those, nearly 400 military installations have been confirmed to have ground water contaminated with PFAS, while contamination is suspected, but not yet confirmed, at hundreds of others.A growing body of research has linked PFAS in water to cancer and a myraid of other potential long-term side effects, including autism, ulcerative colitis, liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression, and autoimmune disorders.The EPA indicates it plans to propose a PFAS national drinking water regulation in the fall. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Chemicals, EPA, Firefighter Foam, PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, Toxicity, Water Contamination Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit SettlementMore Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Stories Firefighter Lawsuits Over Turnout Gear Cancer Risks Consolidated in Minnesota August 25, 2026 Judges to Weigh Firefighter Gear Lawsuit Consolidation This Month July 24, 2026 Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Warrant New MDL Over PFAS Risks: Motion May 18, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: today)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026) Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: yesterday)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026) First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026)
Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: today)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: yesterday)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)
First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026)