Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Philips Recalls Repaired Trilogy and Garbin Plus Ventilators Over Problems with Replacement Sound Abatement Foam Supposedly repaired Trilogy and Garbin Plus Ventilators may experience silicone foam adhesive failure, which could lead to airpaths being blocked, putting ventilator patients at risk. February 17, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments While Philips Respironics continues to repair millions of recalled ventilators, CPAP machines and BiPAP machines with a silcone-based sound abatement foam, federal regulators have announced a new recall impacting certain repaired Trilogy ventilators and Garbin Plus ventilators, indicating that there may be a risk of the new foam material coming loose, and remnants of the old, toxic foam may still pose a serious health risk for patients. On February 16, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it was giving Class I recall status to a Philips Trilogy and Garbin Plus ventilator recall first announced in December, warning that the new silicone sound abatement foam has reportedly suffered adhesion failures, which could cause airflow blockages in the ventilators. The classification means the agency believes these problems could lead to serious injuries or patient deaths. Philips Breathing Machine Recalls Millions of recalled Philips breathing machines sold since 2009 were pulled from the market last year, following widespread reports of small black particles from a polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) being found in the tubing and face masks. Although the foam was intended to reduce noise and vibrations while the machines were used, the FDA warned that the PE-PUR foam may release a number of toxic chemicals and gases directly into the machine’s air pathways. As a result of the potential CPAP foam health risks, federal health officials indicated that all consumers should immediately stop using the recalled machines, unless needed for life-sustaining therapy, and a widespread Philips repair and replacement program was launched to remove the PE-PUR foam from machines and substitute a silicone-based foam. However, this latest Philips recall impacts certain previously repaired ventilators. The new recall comes as the manufacturer already faces thousands of Philips CPAP lawsuits brought by former users of recalled machines, who have been diagnosed with certain types of cancer, lung damage and other side effects from the small foam particles entering their mouth and lungs. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Approximately 13,811 repaired Philips Trilogy 100, Trilogy 200 and Garbin Plus ventilators that were reworked after the June 2021 recall are now being recalled once-again. According to the notice posted by the FDA, the silicone sound abatement foam used to replace the toxic PE-PUR foam in the ventilators may separate from its plastic backing due to failure of the adhesive used to hold it in place. “The silicone foam material may potentially move and block the airpath, which may reduce air flow in the ventilator and could cause the device to alarm,” the recall notice warns. “If an alarm is not recognized or acted upon, the patient could experience trouble breathing, such as asphyxia, hypoventilation, or hypoxemia, which can be life threatening.” In addition, Philips found residual PE-PUR sound abatement foam in some of the ventilators which were “repaired” and returned to customers, which could cause potential health risks to patients. The FDA reports that as of January 4, 2023, the recalled ventilators have been linked to at least 63 reports of foam delamination and 19 reports where PE-PUR foam debris was found inside the machines. A safety communication about the problems was initially released in December 2022, but the agency now considers this action a Class I medical device recall, suggesting that continued use of the repaired Philips machines may pose a risk of serious injury or death. Philips CPAP Recall Repair Problems In September 2021, Philips announced a CPAP machine repair and replacement program, but the pace of repairs has been extremely slow and there have been some concerns about the safety of the alternative foam material the manufacturer is using, which may also release harmful chemicals directly into the machine’s air pathways. The FDA has criticized Philips handling of the recall, indicating that the company has not done enough to warn consumers about the health risks associated with continuing to use recalled CPAP machines. Earlier this month, the FDA that it has received nearly 100,00 medical device reports involving problems with Philips CPAP, BiPAP and ventilator devices, including reports of nearly 350 deaths. February 2023 Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Update Given common questions of fact and law raised in product liability lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system against Philips, a multidistrict litigation (MDL) has been established before U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti, in the Western District of Pennsylvania, who is presiding over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings to establish which specific injuries are caused by exposure to the foam, and the average Philips CPAP settlement amounts each individual plaintiff should receive. On February 6, Judge Conti issued a pretrial order (PDF) which schedules monthly status conferences throughout the year on the following dates: April 20, 2023 May 24, 2023 June 15, 2023 July 20, 2023 August 17, 2023 September 21, 2023 October 19, 2023 November 16, 2023 December 14, 2023 As part of the coordinated management of the litigation, it is expected that Judge Conti will establish a “bellwether” process, where the parties will identify small groups of representative claims to prepare for early trial dates, which are designed to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the proceedings. However, if Philips CPAP machine settlements are not reached in the MDL, each claim may later be remanded to different U.S. District Courts nationwide for separate trial dates in the future. Tags: Asphyxia, Cancer, CPAP, CPAP Recall, Philips, Respiratory, Ventilator, Ventilator Recall Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Blames Ozempic, Mounjaro, Trulicity for Gastroparesis Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago) The makers of GLP-1 drugs, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, face another lawsuit claiming they failed to adequately warn consumers about the risks of gastroparesis injuries. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Vision Loss Risks Extend Beyond Type 2 Diabetics and Ozempic Users, Study Warns (08/06/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Mounjaro Caused Gastroparesis, Severe Metabolic Acidosis Injuries (07/29/2025)Pancreatitis Risks From Ozempic, Mounjaro Being Investigated by U.K. Regulators (07/15/2025) BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Clears Hurdle To Reach Trial in January 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has denied a motion by Hologic to dismiss two BioZorb marker lawsuits scheduled for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITNearly 200 Women Pursuing BioZorb Lawsuits Over Complications With Breast Tissue Marker (08/11/2025)Failed BioZorb Tissue Marker to Require Surgical Removal, Lawsuit Claims (08/04/2025)Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (07/28/2025) Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (Posted: 3 days ago) A tabletop fire pit lawsuit claims a Texas woman’s daughter was set on fire during a family gathering by an unexpected jet of flame from a Colsen fire pit that was later recalled due to burn injury risks. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAlcohol Fire Pit Recall Lawsuits Are Being Filed Over Severe Burn Injuries and Fatalities (08/07/2025)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Lawsuit Blames Ozempic, Mounjaro, Trulicity for Gastroparesis Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago) The makers of GLP-1 drugs, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, face another lawsuit claiming they failed to adequately warn consumers about the risks of gastroparesis injuries. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Vision Loss Risks Extend Beyond Type 2 Diabetics and Ozempic Users, Study Warns (08/06/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Mounjaro Caused Gastroparesis, Severe Metabolic Acidosis Injuries (07/29/2025)Pancreatitis Risks From Ozempic, Mounjaro Being Investigated by U.K. Regulators (07/15/2025)
BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Clears Hurdle To Reach Trial in January 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has denied a motion by Hologic to dismiss two BioZorb marker lawsuits scheduled for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITNearly 200 Women Pursuing BioZorb Lawsuits Over Complications With Breast Tissue Marker (08/11/2025)Failed BioZorb Tissue Marker to Require Surgical Removal, Lawsuit Claims (08/04/2025)Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (07/28/2025)
Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (Posted: 3 days ago) A tabletop fire pit lawsuit claims a Texas woman’s daughter was set on fire during a family gathering by an unexpected jet of flame from a Colsen fire pit that was later recalled due to burn injury risks. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAlcohol Fire Pit Recall Lawsuits Are Being Filed Over Severe Burn Injuries and Fatalities (08/07/2025)