Hernia Mesh Trial Involving Ethicon Physiomesh Set To Begin June 22, 2020

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 1 Comment

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits has indicates that the first federal “bellwether” trial will begin on June 22, pushing back the pretrial schedule about two months.

Ethicon Physiomesh is a multi-layered, flexible composite hernia mesh product introduced by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary in 2010. However, the manufacturer removed the product from the market only six years later, amid a large number of complaints involving complications with the hernia mesh, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove it from individuals’ bodies.

There are currently more than 2,300 product liability lawsuits over Ethicon Physiomesh pending throughout the federal court system, each raising similar allegations that the manufacturer sold a defective and unreasonably dangerous product, which caused plaintiffs to suffer severe abdominal pain, infection, hernia recurrence, adhesions, perforations, erosion and other injuries associated with a hernia mesh failure.

Given similar questions of fact and law, the federal cases is centralized for pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Richard Story in the Northern District of Georgia, as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

To reduce duplicative discovery into common issues in the cases, avoid conflicting rulings from different courts and to serve the convenience of parties, witnesses and the judicial system, cases filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide are consolidated before Judge Story for coordinated discovery and a series of early “bellwether” trials, which will test the relative strengths and weaknesses of the cases.

In June, Judge Story announced that the first bellwether trial would go before a federal jury on April 20, 2020. However, in an amended practice and procedure order (PDF) issued on September 23, the start of the first hernia mesh trial in the litigation has been pushed back to June 22, 2020.

The order indicates that by January 27, 2020, the Court will decide the manner of trial, the order of selection for plaintiffs and the timing of additional trial cases. Daubert motions challenging the admissibility of expert witness testimony will be due in each trial case by February 24, 2020, and the Court indicates that a pre-trial conference will be set at an appropriate time before the first trial begins in June.

While the outcomes of this hernia mesh trial, and any other early bellwether cases that go before a jury, will not be binding on other plaintiffs, it will be closely watched by lawyers involved in the litigation and may greatly influence any eventually hernia mesh settlements that may be necessary for Ethicon to avoid thousands of individual trial dates nationwide.

In addition to lawsuits over problems with Ethicon Physiomesh, a number of similar claims are being pursued against manufacturers of other polypropylene products introduced in recent years, including Bard hernia mesh, Covidien Parietex mesh, Atrium C-Qur and other products.

Tags: , , , ,

1 comment

  1. Joan Reply

    I just don’t understand why the court continues over and over to keep pushing the 1st bellwether Ethicon hernia cases. It literally blows my mind that the companies being sued SPEND millions and millions of dollars to continue slowing the process down. They pay that money to their attorneys, again millions. Instead of trying to get these cases heard sooner, saving much of those millions, and paying instead to the actual people that were injured due to their product. Also MDL suits are supposed to speed up the process yet everything I’ve read takes so much longer for the individual than had they just found an attorney to keep there case as an individual suit. I also think that plaintiff’s should be given notice that their cases are being directed to the MDL suit, they should be contacted and be allowed to make the decision.

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.