Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Recall Repairs Now Required on All Rental Cars Under New Law June 3, 2016 Russell Maas Add Your Comments New legislation that went into effect this week now requires that all car rental companies repair any outstanding recalls impacting vehicles in their fleet before renting the cars to customers, extending the National Highway Traffic Safety Administrations (NHTSA) authority to investigate and punish violators. The new rental car recall repair law was announced by the NHTSA on June 1, indicating that all rental car agencies carrying fleets of 35 vehicles or more must repair any and all open safety defects before renting the vehicles to customers, or be subject to punishment and fines. The new law gives the NHTSA full powers for the first time to monitor, investigate and enforce penalties or repair actions on qualifying rental car companies. The new requirements comes as part of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act of 2015. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Prior to the new law’s passing, only new vehicles sold through dealerships were required to be repaired of any safety defects, whereas rental car companies were not mandated to repair any open safety recalls announced by the NHTSA, placing consumers at risk of injuries or auto accidents caused by known and avoidable safety defects. The push for rental car companies to require repairs of safety defects has been urged for several years by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx and NHTSA Administrator Dr. Mark Rosekind. Foxx stated in the press release that families picking up rental cars on vacations should be able to expect the vehicle is free from any known safety defects. Foxx also thanked Congress and the safety advocates for helping “turn this common-sense idea into law.” The NHTSA credited efforts from the family of Raechel and Jacqueline Houck, two sisters that died in a fiery crash in 2004 on a California highway. The sisters rented a PT Cruiser from an Enterprise Rental car facility, which had an outstanding recall on a power steering leak that was never repaired. Experts hired by the family to reconstruct the accident and the cause determined the driver lost power steering ability, causing the vehicle to cross a grass median and hit a tractor trailer, bursting into flames instantly and killing both sisters. Although Enterprise challenged the case, arguing that the driver’s actions caused the crash, a jury awarded $15 million in damages to the parents who filed the wrongful death lawsuit. Used Car Dealers Unaffected Although the new law resolves unrepaired recalls in rental vehicles, used car dealerships are still not required by law to repair safety defects before the sale of the vehicle. Consumer interest groups have made efforts to change the current laws requiring used car dealerships repair recalls before the sale, citing CarMax as one of the top responsible for the resale of unrepaired vehicles. The California Public Interest Research Group and the Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety Foundation released a study in June 2015 that more than 10% of the nearly 500 cars on the a Sacramento, California CarMax sale lot had unrepaired recalls and seven vehicles were subject to two or more unrepaired safety recalls. One incident report the groups refers to in their petition occurred in Irvine, California, where a couple with children purchased a “CarMax Quality Certified” Dodge Ram 1500 from CarMax on May 19, 2015 because they wanted a safer vehicle to transport their children. After they purchased the truck they were informed by Chrysler that a safety recall had been in effect for over a year on that vehicle due to the drive shaft reportedly separating from the rear axle. When the couple tried to return the vehicle to CarMax, the dealer denied their claims and told them it was their problem now. Just 11 days after purchasing the vehicle, without warning, the drive shaft separated from the axle and the truck fell apart on the freeway and caught on fire. The couple and their 12 year old daughter barely escaped the vehicle before it burst into flames, which closed down the freeway for nearly four hours while first responders fought to put out the fire. Tags: Auto Accidents, Auto Recalls, Congress, Rental Cars More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order April 1, 2025 Judge Rejects J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Filing, Killing $9B Talcum Powder Settlement April 1, 2025 Igloo Cooler Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fingertip Amputation Risks April 1, 2025 1 Comments Albert May 10, 2021 Enterprise gave me illegal recall car to use to travel me and my family from California to New mexico. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)