Roundup Class Action Settlement Objection Will Not Be Considered by U.S. Supreme Court

The denial is the third time the Supreme Court has refused to overturn a Roundup lawsuit decision.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to consider an appeal that sought to challenge a $39 million Roundup class action settlement, which will include a $14 million contribution to non-profit organizations after class members are compensated.

Bayer and its Monsanto subsidiary have faced more than 120,000 Roundup lawsuits in recent years, primarily involving claims brought by former users diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. However, the manufacturers of the controversial weedkiller have also faced a number of consumer class action lawsuits over Roundup, seeking damages on behalf of different groups of individuals, even if they have not yet been diagnosed with any specific injury.

Billions in Roundup settlements have been paid over the past few years to resolve individual injury lawsuits, but Bayer and Monsanto continue to face on-going litigation in cases where former users rejected the settlement offers, as well as class action claims seeking refunds, medical monitoring and other damages.

Learn More About

Roundup Lawsuits

Exposure to RoundUp May Increase Risk of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and Other Cancers. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

Last year, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who is overseeing centralized proceedings for the Roundup litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, approved a Roundup class action settlement agreement, which included a $39 million fund to provide refunds of about 20% of the average retail price consumers paid.

At least one plaintiff has challenged the settlement, appealing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit after it was determined that $14 million would go to non-profit organizations, known as a cy pres award, which courts are permitted to do with unallocated or undeliverable funds from a settlement or judgment. The plaintiff argued that the District Court did not do enough to engage with plaintiffs before making the decision, and should have divided the funds up among the class members.

The Eight Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s arguments however, who then petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the matter.

On May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a docket entry denying the petition, meaning the Roundup class action settlement will stand. It also means that the court doctrine allowing cy pres awards can continue.

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Roundup Appeals

This is the third time the U.S. Supreme Court has denied a petition to review a Roundup lawsuit decision.

In June, the high court denied writ of certiorari on two different Roundup lawsuit trial awards, including one involving an $87 million verdict awarded to Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a California couple who claimed that exposure to Roundup caused them both to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A California state court jury originally tried to award the couple more than $2 billion, but that was later reduced by a federal judge.

The other decision involved the appeal of a $25 million verdict in favor of Edwin Hardeman, which was the first Roundup lawsuit to go before a federal jury in March 2019.

Bayer and it’s Monsanto subsidiary had originally hoped that the U.S. Supreme Court would weigh in to overturn the early verdicts, upholding defenses that the manufacturers thought may allow it to escape liability for failing to warn about the Roundup cancer risks.

While thousands of non-Hodgkins lymphoma lawsuits have been resolved through Roundup settlements, there are still many claims continuing to work their way through the court system, with a steady stream of trials expected to go be held throughout 2023 and 2024.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024
Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024 (Posted yesterday)

A federal judge is allowing plaintiffs to file large numbers of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits in one bundled complaint, to meet a potential two-year statute of limitations deadline, with the ability to flesh those claims out in more detail at a later date.