Sale of Drawstring Sweatshirts Blamed for Child’s Death Result in Stiff Fines

|

Kohl’s Department Store and other companies have been fined more than $600,000 for continuing to manufacture and sell children’s drawstring sweatshirts, which have been linked to the strangulation death of at least one child while he was going down a slide.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) promulgated a rule in 2006 that determined all children’s shirts, sweaters, coats and jackets with drawstrings at the hood or neck were defective and presented a substantial risk of injury to children.

According to press releases by the CPSC on September 8, several companies continued to make and sell products that violated that rule, leading to a $425,000 fine for Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., a $100,000 fine for Hill Sportswear, Inc., a total of $85,000 between Maran Inc. and K.S. Trading Corp.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

A sweatshirt with drawstrings made by Hill Sportswear was blamed for the November 2008 strangulation death of a 3-year-old boy in Fresno, California. His drawstring became stuck on a play set on a playground, strangling him. About 120,000 of the Kid Pullover Hood and Kid Zipper with Hood sweatshirts were recalled in February 2009.

The largest fine will be paid by Kohl’s Department Stores Inc., for selling about 40,000 hooded sweatshirts with drawstrings that were recalled in March 2009.

This is the second penalty for Kohl’s since the drawstring ban was enacted. The company was forced to pay $35,000 in civil penalties after a recall of 4,500 Candie’s sweatshirts with drawstrings last year.

In agreeing to the civil penalty settlements, all of the companies deny that they knowingly violated the regulation.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a man’s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.