Merck to Pay $950M To Settle Vioxx Lawsuit Over Off-Label Marketing

  • Written by: Staff Writers

To settle claims by the federal government that it illegally marketed the recalled drug Vioxx, Merck has agreed to pay nearly $1 billion. 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Tuesday that it had reached a Vioxx settlement with the pharmaceutical giant and that Merck will plead guilty to violating federal law and promoting Vioxx illegally.

Merck was accused of promoting Vioxx for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis before it received approval for that use from the FDA in 2002. The drug maker later issued a Vioxx recall in 2004, after the pain medication was found to double the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

Merck will pay a $321,636,000 criminal fine for illegal off-label marketing of Vioxx, the DOJ reports. The company will also pay a $628,364,000 civil fine over off-label marketing and what the DOJ calls false statements over the drug’s cardiovascular safety. The civil fine will be divided between the U.S. government and participating Medicaid states. 

Merck has already had to pay $4.85 billion to settle Vioxx lawsuits filed on behalf of individuals who suffered an injury after using the medication. The lawsuits accused the company of failing to warn patients about the potential Vioxx side effects, even though evidence suggested Merck was aware of the risks long before the recall was issued.

Federal investigators say that Merck lied about the safety of Vioxx to increase the drug’s sales, which led to Medicaid agencies in the states and the federal government issuing reimbursements under false pretences.   

In addition to money, Merck has agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The agreement will give the OIG expanded oversight and review procedures over the company in order to monitor Merck’s activities and prevent future illegal marketing tactics. 

Federal law makes it illegal for drug manufacturers to promote a drug for a use that has not been approved by the FDA. While such “off-label” marketing is illegal for the manufacturer, doctors have the ability to prescribe whatever drug they see fit.

Tags: , , ,


  1. Daniel Reply

    Be aware of drugs that potentiate diabetes.
    Eli Lilly Zyprexa Olanzapine issues linger.

    The use of powerful antipsychotic drugs has increased in children as young as three years old. Weight gain, increases in triglyceride levels and associated risks for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The average weight gain (adults) over the 12 week study period was the highest for Zyprexa—17 pounds. You’d be hard pressed to gain that kind of weight sport-eating your way through the holidays.One in 145 adults died in clinical trials of those taking the antipsychotic drug Zyprexa.
    This was Lilly’s #1 product $5 billion per year sales,moreover Lilly also make billions more on drugs that treat diabetes.

    — Daniel Zyprexa victim activist and patient.

  2. vdeboer Reply

    i received some compensation for a heart attack from taking vioxx. medicare fled a lein and took a part of the settlement. will i receive any of this back and also will i be elgible for any part of the new funds?

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.