Spinal Fusion Malpractice Lawsuit Filed Over Use of Medtronic Infuse

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson

A Pennsylvania man has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit after he experienced complications following a spinal fusion surgery where Medtronic Infuse BMP was used as an alternative to a traditional bone graft. 

Medtronic Infuse is a bioengineered bone growth stimulant, known as a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), which was introduced in 2002 and has been aggressively promoted by the manufacturer as an alternative to bone grafts that require bone to be harvested from another part of the body or from cadavers.

Although the FDA only approved Infuse BMP for use during spinal fusion surgery that involves a single level, anterior lumbar fusion, it has been widely used off-label for other types of spine surgery.

Lawsuit Alleges Product Liability and Medical Malpractice Claims

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Norman Kornitzer in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey on November 14, alleging that the design of the Medtronic Infuse bone graft device and a lack of proper medical care by the surgeon caused him to experience permanent injuries following a surgery two years ago.

Kronitzer indicates that he underwent a spinal fusion surgery on November 14, 2010, which was performed by Dr. Louis Quartararo at the New Jersey Spine Institute. During the procedure, Dr. Quartararo used Medtronic’s Infuse bone graft device to stimulate bone growth in the spine and promote fusion of the vertebrae.

A number of individuals throughout the United States have filed similar lawsuits over Medtronic Infuse BMP use during spinal fusion surgery, which has been linked to a risk of inflammation, nerve damage and other complications.

In 2008, the FDA issued an alert advising doctors not to use the Medtronic Infuse in upper spinal fusion procedures, after receiving a large number of reports involving deaths and other complications that resulted from swelling of the neck and breathing difficulties.

According to allegations raised in product liability lawsuits filed against Medtronic in courts throughout the United States, the manufacturer failed to warn about the risk of excessive bone growth following use of Infuse BMP, which may be more likely when the device is used off-label. The growth of excess bone around the spine may result in permanent nerve damage and other problems following spinal fusion surgery. 

Complaints also allege the manufacturer actively encouraged use of the Medtronic Infuse bone graft during procedures that were not only unapproved, but that the device maker knew or should have known posed an increased risk of serious injury or death.

Kornitzer’s spinal fusion malpractice lawsuit includes allegations of negligence against his doctor and the New Jersey Spine Institute, claiming that they failed to follow the appropriate standards of medical care. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, as well as legal fees.

Tags: , , , ,


  1. Vincent Reply

    I have the same problem
    I had fusion done and it ruined my life they did it to
    Me When I was 16 years old

  2. EDEM Reply

    Had tri-level cervical fusion 11/2010. I am now almost useless to my self.

  3. curtis Reply

    I had cervical surgery Oct.2010 every since this surgery I have had several underlying medical conditions that have to do with infections osymelites infections that have to do with the bones I have had several treatments and still fight this today is this a medical condition from this surgery? Am I the only one that has dealt with this kind of infection? I pray every day that the doctors find what is causing this because I been fighting it every since the cervical surgery 4 long years

  4. emma Reply

    i had a Medtronic spinal cord implant with a battery charger put in in sept 2016 since then I have had complications with my bladder and looking at permanent catherization . need to know what to do now

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.