Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
St. Jude QuickSite and QuickFlex CRT Lead Problems Identified April 5, 2012 Staff Writers Add Your Comments After identifying additional problems with the small wires used to connect their cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices to the heart, St. Jude Medical, Inc. has announced that it is halting sales of two more types of leads. On April 4, St. Jude indicated that they will stop selling QuickSite and QuickFlex left-ventricular leads, which are used in defibrillators known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. The manufacturer indicates that the defibrillator leads have insulation problems, which is almost exactly the same problem that led to a St. Jude Riata lead recall about four months ago. Learn More About St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit A St. Jude Riata defibrillator lead recall was issued due to a risk of insulation failure. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit A St. Jude Riata defibrillator lead recall was issued due to a risk of insulation failure. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION At least 39 confirmed reports have been identified where the conducting material inside the St. Jude QuickSite and QuickFlex CRT lead wires have been seen poking through the insulation. Although there have been no reports of patient injuries or of patients losing therapy due to the defective leads, this poses a serious safety concern. More than 171,000 QuickSite and QuickFlex leads have been sold worldwide. Although the incident rate is only 0.023, the problems are likely underreported because the leads often continue to work. In a letter to physicians, the company estimated that the problem affects 3% to 4% of all QuickSite and QuickFlex leads. In late November, St. Jude sent another Physician Advisory Letter to warn doctors about similar problems with their Riata and Riata ST leads, which also had problems with conductors poking through the leads’ insulation. The FDA reported at at that time that at least two patient deaths and one serious injury had been linked to the externalized conductor problem. The rate of incidence with the Riata and Riata ST leads appears to have been much higher, affecting about 19% of all patients. Earlier this month, research presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting in Chicago found that the St. Jude Riata leads were actually failing in multiple ways that could cause problems for consumers. After looking at 105 reports of lead wire failures, researchers found that two-thirds suffered from more than the wires poking through the insulation, but in some cases they produced static noise that could cause unnecessary shocks or drain power needed for life-saving heart stimulation. The internal defibrillators are designed to be implanted near a patient’s heart, monitor the heart rhythms and give life-saving electrical shocks if necessary. The defibrillator leads, which deliver the electrical charge, are supposed to remain covered by insulation once implanted. However, in some cases it appears that the leads have penetrated the insulation and parts of those leads are bare and uncovered inside patients’ bodies. The recalled leads pose a serious health concern, as it is largely impractical for patients to have the small lead wires removed, leaving patients with more frequent medical follow ups and the need to hope that they do not experience any of the problems associated with the small wires that connect their implanted defibrillator to their heart. Tags: Defibrillator, Defibrillator Lead, ICD, St. Jude Image Credit: | More St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit Stories Leadless Pacemakers May Have Lower Complications Rates: Study October 20, 2021 St. Jude Defibrillator Lawsuit Alleges Device Failure Resulted in Fatal Auto Accident October 5, 2017 Implanted Defibrillators Linked To High Risk Of Complications: Study May 9, 2016 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: today) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025) Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: yesterday) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: 2 days ago) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
St. Jude Defibrillator Lawsuit Alleges Device Failure Resulted in Fatal Auto Accident October 5, 2017
Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: today) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: yesterday) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: 2 days ago) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)