FDA Hopes To Improve Surgical Staplers Safety Through New Rules And Guidance

To address growing concerns, federal health regulators want manufacturers to put more stringent label warnings on surgical staplers, and to classify them as moderate risk medical devices, increasing the regulatory requirements for getting new ones approved for sale.

On April 24, the FDA published a proposed rule to change the classification of surgical staplers from low risk to moderate risk medical devices in the Federal Register. The agency also published a draft guidance that urges medical device manufacturers to be more thorough in explaining the potential risks, complications and contraindications linked to surgical stapler use.

The two actions come following an FDA warning to doctors in early March about the high numbers of surgical stapler complications and patient  injuries reported in recent years. According to the agency, it received more than 41,000 reports of adverse events between January 2011 and the present.

|
|

The most commonly reported problems linked to surgical staplers involve an opening of the staple line, malformation of staples, staplers misfiring, staplers being too difficult to fire, staplers failing to fire and staplers that were misapplied. The FDA warning indicates that stapler malfunctions or misuse can cause prolonged surgical procedures, the need for additional surgeries, and other complications; such as bleeding, sepsis, internal organ damage, and death.

“Alerting the public and health care professionals was an important step, but as we shared at that time, we believe additional actions must be taken to better ensure the safe and effective use of these devices,” Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in an April 23 press release. “To that end, today we are announcing three new efforts with the goal of better protecting patients from the malfunctions, injuries and deaths associated with these devices.”

The proposed rule changes the classification of surgical staplers from Class I (low risk) to Class II (moderate risk). Manufacturers of Class I devices are not required to submit a premarket approval notification before putting those devices on the market, meaning the FDA does not get a chance to review their safety and effectiveness.

This reclassification would require surgical staplers to undergo mandatory performance testing, demonstrations of usability and labeling requirements, among other control measures. It would be mandatory and a regulatory requirement.

The draft guidance is not mandatory, but instead lays out the FDA’s thinking on how surgical staplers should be labeled, what warnings should be added and what information gives doctors and patients the information necessary to make certain decisions about their risk-benefit profile.

Both are currently open to public comment, and Shuren also announced that the FDA will hold a public meeting of it’s General and Plastic Surgery Devices advisory panel on May 30, 2019 to discuss surgical stapler concerns and future regulation.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A new lawsuit against Roblox alleges that the platform’s inadequate safety measures enabled multiple sexual predators to exploit a five-year-old girl.
Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm.
Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety.