Case Against UBS Over Lehman Brothers Notes Results in $200k Award

An investor has been awarded $200,000 in a stockbroker fraud claim against UBS Financial Services over the sale of Lehman Brothers structured notes, which were rendered virtually worthless after the September 2008 collapse of the investment bank.

The arbitration claim was filed through the Financial Industry Regulator Authority (FINRA) by Patricia Flanagan, who originally sought $300,000 in compensation for losses involving Lehman Brothers notes, which were sold as a conservative and safe investment. This is one of the first Lehman Brothers awards arising out of the sale of the notes by UBS and other brokerage firms.

Lehman Brothers structured notes were a hybrid financial instrument, constructed from a combination of stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities and derivatives, which were promoted by many brokers as low-risk investments, even as Lehman Brothers faced substantial financial troubles. Although investors were told that the notes carried a guaranteed principal protection, that guarantee became worthless when Lehman filed for bankruptcy protection on September 15, 2008.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

FINRA is a non-governmental regulatory body that oversees more than 5,000 brokerage firms throughout the United States. Investors are able to resolve disputes against brokerage firms through FINRA for claims involving breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, misrepresentation, breach of contract, unauthorized trading and other claims that investments were improperly handled.

Flanagan’s UBS broker bought a $225,000 guaranteed principal protection note and a $75,000 return optimization note for Flanagan. The three-person panel overseeing the case ruled that Flanagan should be compensated $150,000 plus interest and attorneys fees for the guaranteed principal protection note, for a total of about $200,000. However, she was not compensated for the return optimization note.

A UBS class action lawsuit was filed last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of all investors who were sold Lehman Brothers Principal Protection Notes by the brokerage firm. The complaint alleges that UBS brokers made false and misleading statements that omitted material facts about the risk associated with investing in the Lehman structured notes. However, according to financial fraud lawyers investigating Lehman Brothers claims on behalf of investors, most individuals are in a better position to recover their losses through a FINRA arbitration claim.

Image Credit: |


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Management of Ozempic Lawsuit Pretrial Proceedings To Be Reassigned Following Death of MDL Judge
Management of Ozempic Lawsuit Pretrial Proceedings To Be Reassigned Following Death of MDL Judge (Posted today)

The judge overseeing Ozempic lawsuits consolidated in federal court has died, requiring a new judge to be assigned to oversee coordinated pretrial proceedings over claims the diabetes drug and similar medications caused stomach paralysis and other intestinal complications.

Baby Food Injury Lawyers Appointed To Leadership Roles in Autism, ADHD Lawsuits Over Heavy Metal Contamination
Baby Food Injury Lawyers Appointed To Leadership Roles in Autism, ADHD Lawsuits Over Heavy Metal Contamination (Posted 2 days ago)

A group of 19 plaintiffs' lawyers have been appointed to serve in various leadership position during the consolidated pretrial proceedings for all baby food injury lawsuits, taking actions that benefit all families pursuing claims for children diagnosed with autism, ADHD or other developmental problems from toxic heavy metals found in many popular products sold in recent years.