Uloric Lawsuit Claims Manufacturer Deceived Patients Over Heart Risks

A Tennessee man says he suffered a heart attack from Uloric, due to the manufacturer’s decision to mislead the medical community, regulators and consumers about the safety profile of the popular gout treatment.

Timothy Dixon filed the complaint (PDF) against Takeda Pharmaceuticals in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on April 15, indicating the side effects of Uloric have endangered thousands of users, who were never warned about the potential heart risks linked to the medication.

In 2011, Dixon was prescribed Uloric for the treatment of a diagnosed gout condition and high blood uric acid levels. However, in April 2019, he suffered a heart attack and discontinued Uloric use, which the lawsuit blames for Dixon’s heart problems.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The lawsuit indicates Takeda Pharmaceuticals has long known about the link between Uloric and heart attack risks, but attempted to keep the information away from the public and federal regulators.

Dixon claims the company knew of several fatal or life-threatening adverse reactions linked to Uloric use, including those from interactions with other drugs, but failed to add those concerns to the warning label.

“Defendants ignored reports from patients and health care providers throughout the United States of Uloric’s failure to perform as intended, which led to the severe and debilitating injuries suffered by Plaintiff and numerous other patients,” the lawsuit states. “Rather than doing adequate testing to determine the cause of these injuries or rule out Uloric’s design as the cause of the injuries, Defendants continued to market Uloric as a safer and more effective prescriptive drug as compared to other available alternative treatment for hyperuricemia and gout.”

Uloric (febuxostat) was introduced by Takeda Pharmaceuticals in 2009, and is designed to lower the blood uric levels among adults diagnosed with gout.

Amid aggressive marketing, the drug has rapidly become a blockbuster over the past 10 years. However, growing evidence has emerged in recent years that established a link between Uloric and heart attacks, leading the FDA to require new warnings last year.

In February 2019, the FDA announced that the drug must carry the strongest label warning the agency can require a drug maker to place on their product, adding a Uloric “black box” warning about the risk of heart problems, which was not adequately reflected by the drug maker in the past.

While there were some signs of potential heart risks with Uloric when the drug was first released, it appears the FDA did not understand the true scope of the problems until Takeda released the results of a post-marketing clinical trial. However, growing evidence now suggests Takeda knew or should have known about the Uloric heart attack risks well before then, yet continued to market the drug without adequate warnings.

Although some critics called for a Uloric recall, the FDA decided to allow the drug to remain on the market, with severe limitations on its approved uses.

Dixon’s case is one of a growing number of Uloric lawsuits being pursued by individuals throughout the U.S., each raising similar allegations that heart attacks and other cardiac problems may have been avoided if Takeda had provided earlier warnings about the risks associated with the gout treatment.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits
Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has agreed to divide lawsuits over gastroparesis injuries linked to drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro into multiple phases, examining how the condition is diagnosed and whether plaintiffs' claims are preempted by federal laws.

Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn
Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn (Posted 3 days ago)

Lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories failed to provide families and the medical community with adequate warnings about the risks associated with it’s cow’s milk-based Similac formula, which a now adult woman indicates has left her with life-long NEC injuries.

Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects
Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects (Posted 4 days ago)

Six breast cancer patients have asked a federal judge for permission to amend a complaint filed in March 2024, which describes problems linked to the device and painful side effects experienced when the tissue marker migrated out of position or shattered inside their bodies.