Ventralight Hernia Patch Caused Pain, Infections, And Can’t Be Removed, Lawsuit Claims

A product liability lawsuit filed in New Jersey federal court indicates that problems with the Bard Ventralight hernia patch caused a California many to suffer severe internal injuries, after the mesh became so entangled in his body that it cannot be removed. 

The complaint (PDF), was filed by Jesus Nunez and his wife Virginia Nunez on March 21, indicating that C.R. Bard, Inc. and it’s Bard Davol, Inc. subsidiary manufactured and sold a defectively designed hernia patch, which was unreasonably dangerous given the utility of the product and risk of complications involved in it’s use.

Jesus Nunez indicates that his surgeons implanted a Bard Ventralight ST Hernia Patch in March 2016, during a ventral hernia repair procedure. However, after the operation he continued to suffer chronic abdominal pain, contracted several infections, and had fluid draining from the umbilicus.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

Did you or a loved one receive a hernia mesh?

Hernia mesh lawsuits are being filed against Bard, Atrium, Covidien and several other hernia mesh manufacturers over mesh failures resulting in injuries and additional surgery.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

“The mesh continues to cause chronic abdominal pain, infections, and fissures,” Nunez’s lawsuit states. “The mesh requires surgical removal, but cannot be removed.”

The case raises allegations similar to those presented in a growing number of other hernia patch lawsuits filed against Bard and other manufacturers in recent months, alleging that certain mesh designs introduced in recent years pose a much higher risk of complications and failure than consumers and the medical community are told.

“The Product was made of materials which are biologically incompatible with human tissue and react negatively and sometimes dangerously with a large number of those on whom it is used,” the lawsuit indicates. “Defendants knew or should have known that their Product was unreasonably harmful.”

Nunez’s lawsuit presents claims of negligence, design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, breach of warranty and violation of consumer protection laws. His wife presents claims of loss of consortium.

In addition to cases involving Bard Ventralight, similar allegations are presented in hundreds of Bard Ventralex mesh lawsuits and claims over other polypropylene products, including Atrium C-Qur lawsuits and Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits.

Image Credit: |


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Johnson & Johnson Faces Medical Monitoring Lawsuit Over Future Baby Powder Cancer Risks
Johnson & Johnson Faces Medical Monitoring Lawsuit Over Future Baby Powder Cancer Risks (Posted today)

Women who used Johnson's Baby Powder around their genitals for feminine hygiene purposes now live in fear of developing ovarian cancer, according to the class action lawsuit seeking medical monitoring for future diagnoses

More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing
More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing (Posted yesterday)

A bundled complaint of about 9,600 Suboxone lawsuits were filed in federal court on Friday, ahead of the two-year anniversary of the FDA requiring tooth decay label warnings on the opioid treatment film strips, which is also a deadline for filing a civil complaint in many states.