Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Generic Manufacturers and Repackagers Seek To Dismiss Ranitidine Class Action Lawsuits November 11, 2020 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsPlaintiffs are pushing back against an attempt by generic drug manufacturers and repackagers to dismiss ranitidine class action lawsuits filed over the risk of cancer from high levels of the chemical byproduct found in all versions of the heartburn drug, which was more commonly known by the brand name Zantac.Over the past year, ranitidine recalls have been issued for all versions of prescription and over-the-counter Zantac, as well as generic equivalents sold by a number of different companies, after it was discovered that the active pharmaceutical ingredient converts to the known carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) when stored at high temperatures or inside the body.In addition to hundreds of individual Zantac injury lawsuits filed by former users diagnosed with various types of cancer, ranitidine class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of both consumers exposed to the medications and third payors who covered the costs for the defective pills.Stay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreLast month, generic manufacturers and repackagers filed a motion to dismiss (PDF) consumer class action and third-party claims, saying the plaintiffs failed to show that they were injured by taking ranitidine.In an opposition motion (PDF) filed on November 9, plaintiffs refuted that claim, indicating that economic damages and the buildup of NDMA in the bodies of consumers, as well as costs associated with medical monitoring that will now be required, constitute โinjuriesโ under the law.โAt minimum, to warrant dismissing any claims Defendants would need to identify law incorporating their proposed rule that applies in this case,โ the opposition motion states. โDefendants do not even attempt to meet this standard.โEach of the complaints raise similar allegations, indicating the drug makers knew or should have known ranitidine contained in Zantac was inherently unstable, yet they continued to market and sell the drug for decades, exposing users throughout the U.S. to an increased risk of cancer that may continue for years. The ranitidine class action lawsuits also seeking medical monitoring for former users, who may now face an increased risk of cancer for years in the future.Ranitidine LitigationZantac and generic ranitidine have been used by millions of Americans for treatment and prevention of heartburn, as the medication has been one of the top selling drugs for decades. However, all versions have now been pulled from the market due to concerns that high levels of NDMA produced by ranitidine expose consumers to an unreasonable risk.The problems are not linked to a manufacturing problem where the chemical contaminated the pills, but rather NDMA is believed to be a byproduct of the inherent chemical structure of ranitidine in the Zantac pills, which can convert to the cancer-causing chemical during storage at high temperatures or inside the human body.Given common allegations raised in class action complaints and individual product liability lawsuits, the litigation has been centralized in the federal court system, where cases filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide are currently pending before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg in the Southern District of Florida for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.There are currently about 500 complaints filed in the federal court system, with thousands of additional claims under active investigation by Zantac recall lawyers. As part of the consolidated management of the litigation, it is expected that Judge Rosenberg will establish a bellwether program, where small groups of representative cases will be set for early trial dates to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony. While the outcomes will not be binding on other claims, they may greatly influence any Zantac settlements that they manufacturers are later willing to offer to avoid individual trial dates throughout the federal court system. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Drug Recall, Heartburn, Heartburn Drug, NDMA, Ranitidine, ZantacMore Zantac Lawsuit Stories Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall June 18, 2025 Jury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim February 5, 2025 Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California November 22, 2024 0 CommentsCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026) Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)