Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Medtronic Influenced Studies Not To Disclose Infuse Complications: Report October 26, 2012 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A new congressional report accuses Medtronic of manipulating medical journal articles in favor of its controversial Infuse bone-grafting product. The U.S. Senate Finance Committee report (PDF) found that Medtronic paid out $210 million to authors of studies sponsored by the company that failed to mention many potential complications with the Medtronic Infuse bone grafting device, which could include male sterility, increased cancer risk, back and leg pain, bone problems and infections. According to the 16-month investigation, Medtronic employees edited and sometimes wrote parts of the studies before they were published, failing to disclosure their involvement. Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More “Medtronic’s actions violate the trust patients have in their medical care. Medical journal articles should convey an accurate picture of the risks and benefits of drugs and medical devices, but patients are at serious risk when companies distort the facts the way Medtronic has,” said Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. “Patients everywhere will be better served by a more open, honest system without this kind of collusion.” Medtronic Infuse Side Effects Highlighted by Independent Studies The investigation was sparked by reports that serious and potentially life-threatening complications associated with Medtronic Infuse were not reported by doctors who authored the studies, and who had significant financial ties to Medtronic. Information about the potential Medtronic Infuse bone grafting side effects came to light when independent studies by doctors unaffiliated with the medical device manufacturer were published. There were 13 reports published, and backed by Medtronic, that excluded data on potential complications, but later studies have found problems occur in 10% to 50% of cases where Infuse bone grafting is used, according to the report. The report’s findings indicate that “Medtronic was heavily involved in drafting, editing, and shaping the content of medical journal articles authored by its physician consultants who received significant amounts of money through royalties and consulting fees from Medtronic.” The report also found that those physician authors received about $210 million from the company between November 1996 through December 2010. Investigators said when that wasn’t enough, Medtronic went even further, with company officials inserting language into scientific studies that suggested Infuse was a better, less painful technique than the autograft technique, which involves taking bone graft from the pelvic bone. One email exchange revealed that Medtronic employees urged that a complete list of adverse events linked to Infuse not be published in a 2005 study. When the FDA approved Infuse in 2002, a Dr. Hal Mathew sat on the agency’s advisory panel. The report determined that remarks given by Mathew, a private physician, were actually prepared by Medtronic without the agency’s knowledge. Dr. Mathew was subsequently given a vice president position at the company in 2007. Complications, Off-label Use, Led to Warnings, Lawsuits Medtronic Infuse is a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) that is applied to an absorbable collagen sponge placed within a device known as an LT-Cage, which is then implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse the gaps between vertebrae. Since introducing the bone grafting device in 2002, Medtronic has aggressively promoted Infuse as an alternative to traditional spine fusions, where bone is harvested from another part of the body or from cadavers. Although the FDA only approved the Medtronic Infuse and LT-Cage for the limited spinal procedures involving a single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), where the spine is approached from the front, the Medtronic Infuse has been widely used “off-label” for other types of spine fusion surgery, which have been linked to an increased risk of severe and painful complications caused by excessive or ectopic bone growth. In 2008, the FDA issued an alert about the risk of complications associated with such unapproved uses of Medtronic Infuse, after receiving a number of reports involving serious adverse events and deaths, often involving use in the cervical spine where excessive bone growth caused by Infuse may impact the airway. A growing number of individuals throughout the United States are now pursuing a Medtronic Infuse bone grafting lawsuit, alleging that the device was defectively designed and that Medtronic failed to adequately warn doctors or patients about the risk of problems. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bone Graft, Congress, Medtronic, Medtronic Infuse Image Credit: ||| More Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermFacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025) Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (Posted: 2 days ago) Roblox is facing a lawsuit from a Georgia mother who alleges the platform’s failure to implement adequate child safety measures allowed online predators to groom her young son. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITRoblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025)Roblox Sexual Exploitation Lawsuit Alleges 10 Year Old Girl Coerced Into Sending Explicit Images for Robux (08/25/2025) MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) Hearings over the validity of expert witnesses in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits will begin on April 1, 2026, when plaintiffs’ experts must convince the judge that their testimony linking the products to cancer is scientifically reliable enough to be presented to juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITUterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study (07/08/2025)Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (07/03/2025)Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (Posted: 2 days ago) Roblox is facing a lawsuit from a Georgia mother who alleges the platform’s failure to implement adequate child safety measures allowed online predators to groom her young son. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITRoblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025)Roblox Sexual Exploitation Lawsuit Alleges 10 Year Old Girl Coerced Into Sending Explicit Images for Robux (08/25/2025)
MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) Hearings over the validity of expert witnesses in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits will begin on April 1, 2026, when plaintiffs’ experts must convince the judge that their testimony linking the products to cancer is scientifically reliable enough to be presented to juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITUterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study (07/08/2025)Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (07/03/2025)Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)