Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Auto Accidents Linked to Cannabis Use Increases with Legalization, Study FindsResearchers from Canada say new impaired driving laws are needed to protect public safety in that country, as U.S. regulators face similar problems linked to rising use of cannabis and legalized marijuana throughout the United States September 12, 2023 Katherine McDaniel Add Your CommentsThe findings of a new study highlights the growing problem of injuries caused by auto accidents involving cannabis use, which appears to increase with widening legalization of marijuana.Researchers from Canada published a report this month in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), indicating that the annual rate of car accident injuries related to cannabis use has increased nearly fivefoldย since 2010.The study comes five years after Canada began legalizing the use of cannabis products nationally in stages. However, researchers warn that as cannabis use increased, so did the number of severe injuries linked to impaired driving auto accidents, leading to calls for new laws aimed at keeping marijuana-impaired drivers from behind the wheel.The findings also pose concerns for U.S. safety officials, after at least 23 states passed measures in recent years legalizing recreational use of marijuana and more than a dozen others have legalized medical cannabis.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn this latest study, researchers analyzed data on about 947,604 traffic injuries involving cannabis use. They looked at several specific periods of time; from the pre-legalization period of January 2010 through September 2018, the period of legalization with restrictions from October 2018 through February 2020, and the period after legalization without restrictions, from March 2020 until December 2021.According to the findings, the number of auto accident injuries related to cannabis use has increased 475.3% from 2010 until the end of 2021. The data indicates there was an increase of 94% in the period just before marijuana was legalized, followed by an increase of 223% in cannabis-related car accident injuries after full legalization.Following the unrestricted legalization of cannabis, theย Canadian government then set limits of the maximum tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) level allowed in a driverโs blood, making it a crime to drive with a blood THC level above 2 nanograms per milliliter. The government also authorized police to screen for impairment at traffic stops and perform THC blood tests in police stations.However, the researchers determined it is likely the number of auto accident injuries involving cannabis will continue to rise, despite these measures. They called for more studies into cannabis-related driving accidents, and urged the government to consider additional policies, regulations and educational measures to prevent impaired driving and protect the public.Car Crashes Linked to Drug and Alcohol Use Rise in U.S.The United States has also seen an increase in auto accidents and accident fatalities related to drug and alcohol use in recent years, as more states pass marijuana legalization laws.According to a study released in January by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than half of all serious and fatal auto accidents involved drug or alcohol use between 2019 and 2021.Federal highway safety officials indicated that car accident fatalities in the U.S. have consecutively increased over the last few years, contributing to approximately 33,244 deaths in 2019, 38,824 in 2020, and 42,915 in 2021.The findings also revealed that 55.8% of drivers who sustained severe or fatal injuries in an auto accident tested positive for drug or alcohol use. About a quarter of those drivers tested positive for cannabis, and nearly 20% tested positive for two or more substances.The researchers in the NHTSA study also recommended that their findings be used to assist in predicting the future impact of impaired driving, and to help form future traffic safety regulations. Tags: Alcohol, Auto Accident, Drunk Driver, Impaired Driving, Marijuana Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026 Nexgrill Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Botched Grill Brush Recall June 18, 2026 RAEV E-Bike Lawsuit Claims Battery Fire Caused $1.6M in Property Damage June 18, 2026 1 Comments Brian September 12, 2023 Bologna. Everybody knows that these bogus so-called “tests” and “studies” can only test for and detect residual trace amounts of THC. Which remain detectable for up to months after actually consuming cannabis. Which in no way whatsoever proves actual impairment at the time of an accident. This is nothing more than desperate prohibitionist lies and Reefer-Madness-like propaganda. Intentionally fabricated by prohibitionists with the sole intention of scaring the public away from supporting full federal cannabis legalization nationwide. You aren’t fooling, frightening, nor convincing anybody with at least half a brain who can think for themselves and whom has their very own internet access with Google. Legalizing Cannabis will not create a massive influx of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. It will not create an influx of professionals (doctors, pilots, bus drivers, etc..) under the influence on the job either. This is a prohibitionist propaganda scare tactic. Truth: Responsible drivers don’t drive while impaired on any substance period! Irresponsible drivers are already on our roads, and they will drive while impaired regardless of their drug of choice’s legality. Therefore, legalizing cannabis will have little impact on the amount of marijuana impaired drivers on our roads. The same thing applies to people being under the influence of cannabis on the job. Responsible people do not go to work impaired, period. Regardless of their drug of choice’s legality. What has actually occurred in states that have legalized cannabis is that law enforcement agencies statewide immediately and vigorously began a new policy of testing more drivers than they ever did before legalization occurred for residual trace amounts of THC. Which remain detectable in a driver’s system for up to months after consuming cannabis. This obviously in no way proves actual impairment at the time a driver is pulled over. So for instance, the police get to the scene of a roadside accident with a fatality. The driver at fault, is let’s say for example three times over the legal alcohol BAC limit, but the police also insist on a test for cannabis. Although bear in mind, with a BAC three times over the legal limit for booze and with all the obvious tell-tale signs of impairment, it’s plain for all to immediately see, and know, that alcohol was the drug responsible for this tragedy…. Residual trace amounts of THC are detected in the driver’s system after the police conclude their very specific and intentional policy driven test for those residual trace amounts of THC. A month prior to being pulled over, the driver consumed a little cannabis socially with friends… Obviously, the joint or two from a month ago had nothing to do with this fatal and tragic accident, but the booze the driver drank at the bar before he got into his car that very same night most certainly did. Law enforcement now marks off this accident as another cannabis “INVOLVED” fatality in order to bolster their bogus statistics. Prohibitionists always use terms like “INVOLVED” , “RELATED” or “LINKED” when they tout these horrific sounding statistics and claims. Because they can’t ever prove cannabis impairment alone to be the actual “CAUSE”. In states that have now legalized cannabis, when you get into an accident whether at fault or not at fault even, pulled over for speeding or for anything at all, law enforcement policy will automatically also require that the police administer that very same test for residual trace amounts of THC from up to months prior to being pulled over. Which again, in no way proves impairment whatsoever and then the results are added on as just another one of their bogus cannabis “INVOLVED/RELATED”/LINKED” statistics. This is nothing more than merely another prohibitionist scare tactic. The goal being to frighten and alarm the public back into the strict prohibition of cannabis. Well guess what? The public isn’t buying it and everyone sees the deceit by ever more desperate prohibitionist zealots. Hell-bent on keeping cannabis illegal. So, the public is already well aware that when such claims are made about cannabis “INVOLVED/RELATED/LINKED” deaths, they are flat out lies! Nobody is so gullible as to believe these utterly nonsense prohibitionist claims of massive amounts of new cannabis impaired drivers. Now, I challenge all anti-cannabis prohibitionist types publicly yet again: Please provide us proof of just one single roadway fatality proven one hundred percent to have been “CAUSED” (Not “INVOLVED/ Not “RELATED”/Not “LINKED”) by cannabis impairment and only cannabis impairment, alone. The public is waiting for prohibitionists to provide indisputable proof of just one such death “CAUSED” directly and solely by cannabis impairment, alone. Just one. (Not even the massive influx prohibitionists claim. Just one.) We’ll wait….and wait…and wait….While we all know they simply can’t. Because it’s all just propaganda, lies, and scare-tactics. *yawns* Next? CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: yesterday)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026) Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 2 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: yesterday)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 2 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)