Court Outlines Process for Selecting Bard Hernia Mesh Cases For First Three Trial Dates

With several thousand Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the federal litigation has outlined the process for selecting three “bellwether” trials, which will begin later this year to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence that will be repeated throughout the cases.

There are currently more than 3,500 product liability lawsuits pending against C.R. Bard in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), each raising similar allegations that plaintiffs experienced painful and debilitating complications following hernia repair due to design problems with Bard Ventralex, Bard Perfix, Bard Composix and other polypropylene products sold in recent years.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints, the federal litigation is centralized before U.S. District Judge Edmund A. Sargus in the Southern District of Ohio, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings, including a series of early trial dates set to begin in May, July and September 2020.

Learn More About

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

Cases reviewed for problems with several types of hernia repair products.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

In a case management order (PDF) issued earlier this month, Judge Sargus outlined how the parties will select the initial trial cases, which will be selected from a small pool of “bellwether discovery” claims that have been prepared for trial.

There are currently six cases that have gone through pretrial discovery, including three claims initially selected by each side, which were designed to be representative of allegations repeated throughout various complaints.

Judge Sargus indicates that the Court will now select three claims, after the parties submit briefing that outlines their recommendations for the most appropriate claims to put before juries first.

On January 3, 2020, the parties will simultaneously file their respective briefs, which are not to exceed ten total pages. Each side will then be permitted to file a response to the other side’s proposed cases by January 8, and an in-person status conference will be held on January 10 to make the final selections and set the trial schedules.

In the event any of the three cases set for trial are subsequently dismissed, Judge Sargus indicates that the Court may allow the selection of a replacement case by either the Plaintiffs or Defendants, depending on the circumstances of the dismissal.

Following the selection of Bard hernia mesh bellwether trial cases, the parties must file any dispositive motions and Daubert challenges to the admissibility of expert testimony by January 17, 2020, with oral arguments to be scheduled at a later date.

The bellwether trials are set to begin on May 11, July 13 and September 14, 2020. While the outcome will not be binding on other claims, if the parties fail to reach hernia mesh settlements to resolve large numbers of cases, Judge Sargus may set additional claims for trial or start remanding large numbers of lawsuits back to U.S. District Courts nationwide for individual trial dates.

1 Comments

  • MichelleDecember 23, 2019 at 10:33 pm

    I am.a 40 yr old single mom and I have had a total of 12 surgeries on my hernias and including all the other procedures that had to follow for all of the complications following the removal amd revision surgery done in august of 2017. I then contracted 2 deadly bacterial infections. Mycobacteria(tuberculosis cousin)and pseudomonas. I had wound vacs that mal functioned and spit the bacteria right b[Show More]I am.a 40 yr old single mom and I have had a total of 12 surgeries on my hernias and including all the other procedures that had to follow for all of the complications following the removal amd revision surgery done in august of 2017. I then contracted 2 deadly bacterial infections. Mycobacteria(tuberculosis cousin)and pseudomonas. I had wound vacs that mal functioned and spit the bacteria right back in I had a picc line put in my left arm. Cause I needed round the clock anti biotics for over 9 months the left arm 2 weeks later after picc line put in I had a dvt the. They moved it to the right and had a superficial blood clot then the moved the port to my chest. I suffered rapid weight gain from the meds 40 lbs in under 2 months and the medication was changed from 500 to 1500 amd then the complete otto toxicity killed the nerves I. My ears so bad that I suffer from extreme tinnitus amd have hearing loss to the severity of the ringing. It increased my ptsd anxiety and depression and now I am.awaiting gastric sleeve surgery amd I have something wrong with the colon from all the scar tissue I can not go unless I manually dig it out. My life will never be the same tired of the hospitals not being able to work or support my children and the effect it Has had on them. My 7 yr old says he just wants his old mommy back and I do to.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Johnson & Johnson Proposes $6.5B Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Settlement Offer in Yet Another Bankruptcy Plan
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $6.5B Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Settlement Offer in Yet Another Bankruptcy Plan (Posted 2 days ago)

Johnson & Johnson has proposed a $6.5 billion talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit settlement, which would again require the company go through bankruptcy proceedings which have been rejected twice before by the Courts and plaintiffs.