Bleeding Risk with Newer Blood Thinners Diminish Benefits: Study

The risk of bleeding with Pradaxa and other new-generation blood thinners may negate all of their potential health benefits, according to the findings of new research. 

In a report published on-line this week by The Archives of Internal Medicine, European researchers conducted a seven-study meta analysis of major bleeding events that occurred after the use of blood thinners, finding that medications known as xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors have a high enough rate of bleeding events to diminish the benefits provided by the medications.

The researchers looked at databases of studies conducted on patients who were given blood thinners after suffering acute coronary syndrome (ACS). They found placebo-controlled clinical trials that included more than 30,000 patients. They found triple the risk of bleeding events, but only moderate reductions in the risk of stent thrombosis or further heart problems and no significant effect on the survival of the patient.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

“For the net clinical benefit, treatment with new-generation oral anticoagulant agents provided no advantage over placebo,” the researchers reported. “The use of anti-Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors is associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events, which might offset all ischemic benefits in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an ACS.”

The most popular of the class of direct thrombin inhibitors to date has been Pradaxa, a blood thinner by Boehringer Ingelheim. Released in October 2010, concerns quickly arose over the risk bleeding problems with Pradaxa, often resulting in death or catastrophic injury.

Pradaxa was heralded as a superior alternative to Coumadin (warfarin), because it is easier to use and requires less monitoring. However, the new breed of blood thinner has no available reversal agent to allow doctors to quickly counteract the blood thinning effects if a bleeding even develops, increasing the risk of serious injury or death caused by the uncontrolled hemorrhages. Boehringer Ingelheim officials have said they are currently working on finding a reversal agent for Pradaxa.

A growing number of Pradaxa lawsuits have been filed against the drug maker on behalf of people who have been severely injured or who lost loved ones due to the drug’s side effects.

While there are currently about 50 cases pending in the federal Pradaxa litigation, the number of lawsuit is expected to continue to grow. All federal Pradaxa cases have been centralized before Judge David R. Herndon in the Southern District of Illinois, for coordinated pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Roblox is facing a lawsuit from a Georgia mother who alleges the platform’s failure to implement adequate child safety measures allowed online predators to groom her young son.
Hearings over the validity of expert witnesses in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits will begin on April 1, 2026, when plaintiffs’ experts must convince the judge that their testimony linking the products to cancer is scientifically reliable enough to be presented to juries.