Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
CPSC Files Lawsuit to Force Leachco Podster Infant Sleeper Recalls After Child Deaths Federal safety officials seek to recall more than 180,000 infant lounger products that pose suffocation risks through an administrative enforcement proceeding February 17, 2022 Russell Maas Add Your Comments After Leachco refused to issue a recall for infant lounger products that pose entrapment and suffocation hazards, federal safety officials have filed an administrative lawsuit to force the manufacture to take action. The complaint (PDF) was filed by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on February 9, as part of an effort to force Oklahoma-based Leachco to recall Podster, Podster Plush, Bummzie and Podster Playtime infant loungers following reports of two infant suffocation deaths. The lawsuit comes on the heels of a Podster lounger warning issued by the CPSC last month, which instructed parents and guardians to immediately stop using the popular baby pillows due to the risk infants may roll over unexpectedly and become trapped against the fabric, posing a suffocation risk. The CPSC warning indicated at least two infant sleeper suffocation fatalities have been reported in connection with Leachco Podster, Podster Plush, Bummzie and Podster Playtime loungers. The deaths involved a 17-day old who suffocated to death in a Lechco Inc. infant sleeper in January 2018 and a four-month old who suffocated in December 2015. Despite the two reported infant fatalities, the CPSC says Leachco Inc. has refused to initiate a voluntary recall. The company released a statement on their website the day after the CPSC warning, publicly claiming the CPSC is wrong and that the product packaging has clear warnings that it is not intended to be used as a sleep product or for unsupervised sleep of infants. While the CPSC complaint recognizes Leachco provides warnings to consumers that the product should not be used for sleep and that adult supervision is always required, the agency argues it is foreseeable caregivers will use the Podster without supervision and that it is also foreseeable caregivers will use the Podster for infant sleep. BABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITS Was your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil? Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION BABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITS Was your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil? Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The CPSC Leachco Podster lawsuit states that these foreseeable risks, which have already caused two deaths, cause the infant loungers to present a serious risk for infants and families. The complaint further states the Leachco Podster infant loungers are defective because they are “constructed of thick, soft padding that has a concave shape which can envelop an infant’s face and cause airflow obstruction if an unsupervised infant rolls, moves, or is placed in a position where the infant’s nose and mouth are obstructed by the Podster.” CPSC officials argue the product is defective because it lacks rigid underlying components which impedes an infant’s ability to self-rescue in the event they roll over, move, or become trapped against the fabric. The lawsuit calls for Leachco to recall all Podster, Podster Plush, Bummzie and Podster Playtime infant loungers, and to provide customers and distributors notice of the substantial product hazard. The CPSC also demands Leachco to offer customers a refund of the purchase price and to reimburse retailers, distributors and any other third parties for expenses in connection to the matter. Lastly, the CPSC is ordering Leachco to submit a recall plan that will be subject to approval by the agency, and also require the manufacturer to maintain records of its actions taken to comply for a period of five years. Approximately 180,000 Leachco loungers were sold throughout the United States, which pose suffocation and entrapment risks, through popular retailers like Amazon.com, Bed Bath and Beyond, Buy Buy Baby, Kohls, Macy’s, Toys R Us/Babies R Us, Walmart, and others. The Bummzie model was sold exclusively at Walmart from 2010 to 2018, according to the filing. Over the last several years, multiple baby pillow recalls and warnings have been issued by federal safety officials following reports of children rolling off of the pillows or on to their belly, leaving their face trapped against the fabric. The CPSC indicates infants who have not developed the neck or body strength to roll back over, or away from the pillow-like products, may become trapped and suffocate. Inclined Sleeper Risks Similar to the infant suffocation risks with Leachco Podster sleepers, concerns over inclined infant sleepers were first made public in April 2019, when the CPSC issued a Fisher-Price Rock’n Play warning, instructing consumers to stop placing their infants in the sleepers by three months old, or before they begin to show signs that they can roll over independently. The warning was issued after the CPSC publicly recognized at least 32 infant deaths related to the products. Since the warning, several manufacturers have issued recalls of inclined sleeper products in April, including Fisher-Price’s recall of 4.7 million Rock’n Play Sleepers and a recall of 694,000 Kids II inclined rocking sleepers. Fisher-Price subsequently released an additional inclined sleeper recall in June, impacting 71,000 inclined sleeping accessories sold with their Ultra-Lite Day & Night Play Yards. Fisher-Price has been riddled with a number of inclined sleeper wrongful death lawsuits and class action claims, alleging the manufacturer knew or should have known about the risk of problems, yet delayed announcing a recall or warning, and knowingly allowed parents to continue purchasing life threatening sleeper devices. Following the series of recalls, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) released a survey in August 2019, finding at least 10% of child daycare facilities nationwide currently had one or more of the recalled infant beds in their possession, and were continuing to use the products on a daily basis. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), about 4,000 infants annually die unexpectedly during sleep from accidental suffocation, sudden infant death syndrome, or unknown causes. Many of the reported fatalities are a result of suffocation from rolling on their sides or stomach. To reduce suffocation and accidental deaths, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends infants sleep on their backs positioned on a firm, empty surface, not containing any soft objects toys, pillows or loose bedding. The recommendations call for new parents to always follow the ABCs of safe sleep: Alone on the Back in a bare Crib. Tags: Infant Deaths, Infant Sleeper, Infant Sleeper Recall, Podsters, Suffocation Find Out If You Qualify for Infant Formula NEC Compensation More Baby Formula Lawsuit Stories NEC Formula Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Aug. 2025 June 23, 2025 Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Filed After Newborn Suffers ‘Nearly Total Bowel Necrosis’ June 17, 2025 Reckitt Benckiser Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks June 12, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: today) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025) 12 Hair Dye Lawsuits Over Bladder Cancer Risks Assigned to One Judge in California State Court (Posted: yesterday) A dozen hair dye lawsuits over bladder cancer risks have been consolidated under one California state judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITJudge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (06/16/2025)Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025) BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: 2 days ago) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)
Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: today) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)
12 Hair Dye Lawsuits Over Bladder Cancer Risks Assigned to One Judge in California State Court (Posted: yesterday) A dozen hair dye lawsuits over bladder cancer risks have been consolidated under one California state judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITJudge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (06/16/2025)Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)
BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: 2 days ago) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)