Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
FDA Warns of Delayed Onset Dermal Fillers Inflammation RisksIn addition to inflammation, the FDA warns dermal fillers are linked to increased risks of scarring, embolism, vision loss and stroke. July 10, 2023 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsFederal health officials have issued an updated warning about delayed-onset inflammation risks associated with dermal fillers, which are injectable treatments sometimes used to create a smoother or fuller appearance in the face or lips.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated its warnings on dermal fillers on July 6, adding new information about problems with delayed-onset inflammation near the treatment area to the growing list of possible dermal filler side effects.Common reactions to dermal fillers can include bruising, redness, swelling, and pain, but the new warning indicates the agency has also received reports of delayed-onset inflammation near the treatment area, which can lead to serious health complications.Dermal fillers, also known as injectable implants, are soft tissue fillers, lip and facial fillers, or wrinkle fillers. The treatments are approved by the FDA to help create a smoother or fuller appearance of parts of the face or body, including areas of the nose, edges of the mouth, cheeks, chin, lips, and back of hands. However, patients often need repeat treatments to achieve the desired effect, and success rates will depend on the underlying tissue structure of the body, the volume, and the type of filler used. Additionally, the time the effect lasts depends on the filler material and the area where it is injected.Some dermal fillers are naturally absorbed over time, but some patients can experience side effects after receiving filler injections.In 2015, the FDA required new warning labels for tissue fillers, detailing the risk of problems patients can face after injection, including some serious and permanent side effects. The FDA convened a panel of experts in 2008 to review reports of dermal filler side effects and consider if stronger warnings were needed, then later issued new warning labels for the products.Dermal Filler Patient RisksThe updated warning information indicates delayed inflammation at the treatment site can occur after viral or bacterial illness, infections, vaccinations, or dental procedures. While delayed-onset inflammation can occur, it is rare.Side effects of dermal fillers, including inflammation, typically resolve on their own. But other less common risks can include nodules, or bumps, in or under the skin which may need to be treated with injections, oral antibiotics, or surgical removal, as well as infections, open or draining wounds, a sore at the injection area, allergic reactions or necrosis of the skin area.Other side effects reported to the FDA include severe allergic reactions like anaphylactic shock, filler migrating from the injection site, leakage or rupture of the filler material at the injection site or through the skin, formation of permanent hard nodules, injury to the blood supply after an unintentional injection into a blood vessel, vision abnormalities, loss of vision, or stroke.When dermal fillers are unintentionally injected into blood vessels, tissue death can occur, and it can also lead to stroke or blindness. The risk of this happening is low but can lead to serious complications that can be permanent.Similar problems were seen with injectable silicone for body contouring. The FDA warned patients about the risks of pain, infection, scarring, permanent disfigurement, embolism, and death as possible side effects after receiving injectable silicone.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFDA Dermal Filler Safety RecommendationsThe new warning indicates it is important for doctors to provide patients with fully informed consent before undergoing dermal injections. The FDA also recommends patients search for a dermatologist or plastic surgeon to perform these types of procedures to ensure the best results.The agency says doctors should make sure to use fillers from properly labeled and sealed vials or pre-filled syringes. It is also important for patients to be tested for allergies before receiving dermal fillers made with certain materials, especially those from animals.Patients should never use products not approved by the FDA, purchased bootleg from other countries, sold directly to the public, or sold online, the agency warned. These products are often contaminated or not approved for use in the U.S. These types of unauthorized products pose the greatest risk of side effects to patients. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Dermal Filler, Inflammation, Injection, Plastic Surgery, Stroke, Vision LossMore Lawsuit Stories Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges August 11, 2026 Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week August 11, 2026 Gree Dehumidifier Lawsuit Alleges Defective Appliance Caused House Fire August 11, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026) AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 5 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 5 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)