New FDA Rule Will Require Clear, Conspicuous Warnings on Drug Ads for Consumers

Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising is banned in all developed countries except the United States and New Zealand.

Federal regulators have finalized new rules that are designed to better govern how drug companies can promote prescription medications through advertisements that directly target consumers on TV, radio and other forms of media.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final rule on direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements in the Federal Register on November 21, which will require advertisers to present warning and risk information in a “clear, conspicuous and neutral manner”, as well as explicitly state the name of the drug and its conditions of use.

The regulations involve five standards, including that information is presented in consumer-friendly language and terminology, and that the key message should include clear text displayed on the screen long enough for it to be read easily by viewers. Additionally, drug makers must clearly lay out potential side effects linked to the drug, when a person should avoid taking the medication, and avoid audio or visual elements that may distract consumers from the drug’s negative side effects.

The audio information about a drug’s side effects must be as understandable as the rest of the commercial. This requirement, specifically, will change the way many drug ads have a rapid and frenzied portion toward the end that lists the long list of potential side effects, a segment of drug ads that is nearly unintelligible.

The new requirements only apply to prescription drugs and not over-the-counter drugs, dietary supplements, and other products.

Consumer Drug Advertising Concerns

Drug advertisements have increased dramatically in recent decades, and now account for billions of dollars in direct-to-consumer marketing. However, many drug ads rely on emotional appeals that highly focus on benefits provided by the medication, instead of equally presenting both benefits and potential risks.

Direct-to-consumer ads are banned in all developed countries, with the exception of the U.S. and New Zealand.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Research indicates drug ads influence consumers and can cause them to seek out information on specific drugs and discuss them with their doctors.

Some critics say federal regulators are not strict enough with existing drug commercials, and those ads violate federal guidelines. The FDA launched several studies in 2018 focusing on drug advertising designed to promote disease awareness instead of specific drugs to test how similar those ads were to direct-to-consumer drug ads.

The agency proposed updating advertising standards in 2010 but did not finalize the regulations until now.

The rule, which falls under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act added by the FDA in 2007, goes into effect on May 20, 2024, with a compliance date of November 20, 2024.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Johnson & Johnson Proposes $6.5B Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Settlement Offer in Yet Another Bankruptcy Plan
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $6.5B Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Settlement Offer in Yet Another Bankruptcy Plan (Posted 2 days ago)

Johnson & Johnson has proposed a $6.5 billion talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit settlement, which would again require the company go through bankruptcy proceedings which have been rejected twice before by the Courts and plaintiffs.