Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Consolidation of Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits To Be Considered Next Month By U.S. JPMLThe number of hair relaxer lawsuits has continued to grow as more women link their uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and uterine fibroids to years of using chemical straighteners. December 19, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAt least 100 hair relaxer cancer lawsuits have been filed throughout the federal court system, with thousands of additional claims expectedEach case raises similar allegations that chemical hair straighteners caused uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids or other injuriesA motion has been filed to establish a Hair Relaxer MDL in the federal court systemMDL would centralize all of the lawsuits before one judge for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedingsLEARN MORE ABOUT HAIR RELAXER CANCER LAWSUITSThe U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has scheduled oral arguments for January 26, 2023, to decide whether all hair relaxer lawsuits being filed throughout the federal court by women diagnosed with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and other injuries should be consolidated before U.S. District Judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.Chemical straighteners like Dark & Lovely, Just for Me, Optimum, ORS Olive Oil, Motions and other hair relaxers have been marketed for decades as safe, targeting Black women looking to remove the natural curls in their hair. However, recent studies have found that the hair relaxers or at-home perms expose women to dangerous endocrine-disrupting chemicals, like phthalates, which increase the risk of cancer and other injuries.Nearly a dozen lawsuits againstย LโOrรฉal and Softsheen-Carson and other manufacturers of hair relaxer products have been filed in various different U.S. District Courts, each raising similar allegations that the companies placed profits before the safety of consumers, by failing to disclose the potential cancer side effects of hair relaxers, and lawyers indicate that thousands of additional claims are likely to be filed in the coming months and years.HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATIONDid you or a loved one use hair relaxer products?Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONHAIR RELAXER COMPENSATIONDid you or a loved one use hair relaxer products?Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONGiven common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints spread throughout the federal court system, a group of plaintiffs filed aย motion to establish a hair relaxer MDL (multidistrict litigation)ย earlier this month, which would transfer the claims to one U.S, District Judge to preside over coordinated discovery and a series of early โbellwetherโ trials.In a notice of hearing session (PDF) issued on December 16, the U.S. JPML announced it will hear oral arguments over whether the hair relaxer chemical lawsuits should be consolidated on January 26, at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse in Miami, Florida.In complex product liability litigation, where large numbers of claims raise similar allegations against the manufacturers of similar products, it is common for the claims to be consolidated so that the the parties reduce duplicative discovery that would otherwise be repeated throughout large numbers of claims, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings and to serve the convenience of common parties and witnesses involved in the litigation.Although many of the products have been used by women for decades, and may have caused tens of thousands of cases of uterine cancer, ovarian cancer or uterine fibroids, the manufacturers argued earlier this month that the litigation does not justify formal centralization, indicating that each of the claims should continue on separate tracks in U.S. District Courts nationwide.Hair Relaxer Cancer RisksThe litigation emerged after a number of studies published in recent years established a connection between use ofย hair relaxer and uterine cancer, raising concerns about the wide spread use of the products by Black and other minority women throughout the U.S.In October, researchers published findings in theย Journal of the National Cancer Institute, which warned that ingredients used in theย chemical hair relaxers may cause uterine cancer. Researchers found the rate of uterine cancer was nearly three times greater among women who frequently used hair relaxer chemicals, compared to women who never used the products.A 2019 study published in the International Journal of Cancer (IJC) issued similar findings, indicating women who reported regularly using straighteners and permanent hair dyes were 9% more likely to develop breast cancer than non-users.Over an eight-year period, researchers identified 2,794 cases of breast cancer after chemical hair straighteners use. The study revealed those who frequently used hair straightener products were at a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, finding women using hair straighteners at least every five to eight weeks, had a 30% increased risk of developing breast cancer.Researchers warned that African American women who reported using permanent hair dyes regularly were associated with a 60% increase of breast cancer diagnosis, compared to an 8% increased risk for Caucasian women.Uterine fibroids and endometriosis have been associated with phthalate metabolites used in hair relaxers.As more women learn that their long-term use of hair relaxer may be the cause of uterine cancer, uterine fibroids and other injuries linked to these endocrine disrupting chemicals, the size and scope of the litigation is expected to increase dramatically. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Breast Cancer, Endocrine Disruptors, Endometriosis, Hair Relaxer, Hair Straighteners, L'Oreal, Phthalates, Uterine Cancer, Uterine Fibroids Image Credit: Kelly Heck Photography Find Out If You Qualify for Hair Relaxer CompensationMore Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Stories Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles May 27, 2026 10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates April 7, 2026 Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims April 1, 2026 1 Comments Crystal February 9, 2026 I had fibroids removed a 3x. LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 3 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026) Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 4 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 3 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 4 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)