Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With Kugel, Strattice and Ventralight Hernia Mesh Patches

Following several hernia repair procedures, a New York woman indicates that she has been left with severe and permanent injuries due to design problems associated with several different hernia mesh patches, which were allegedly made of materials that are incompatible with human tissue, according to a recently filed product liability lawsuit. 

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Evelyn Menjivar in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on May 16, indicating that the Composix Kugel Hernia Patch, the Strattice Reconstructive Tissue Matrix and the Bard Ventralight Elipse mesh were all defective, and sold without adequate warnings about the risk that they may cause hernia mesh complications.

Menjivar indicates that she underwent her first surgery in January 2015, involving the Composix Kugel patch, which is manufactured by C.R. Bard and its Bard Davol subsidiary. However, after the hernia mesh failed, resulting in recurrent hernias, she underwent another procedure where she was implanted with the Bard Ventralight mesh and the Strattice Tissue Matrix, which was manufactured by Allergan, Inc. and its LifeCell Corp. subsidiary. However, this led to other adverse events, including scarring, adhesions and chronic abdominal pain.

Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.
Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.

The lawsuit indicates that the manufacturers knew or should have known that their products were defective and harmful, because they were made of materials that are incompatible with human tissue and often cause negative immune responses.

“The Kugel, Strattice, and Ventralight mesh implants…are marketed to the medical community and to patients as a safe, effective, and reliable medical device, implanted by safe and effective, minimally invasive surgical techniques, and is safer and more effective as compared to other products,” the lawsuit states. “Defendants failed to perform proper and adequate testing and research in order to determine and evaluate the risks and benefits of the Hernia Mesh Products.”

The complaint indicates that the manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about risks associated with their product, which were defectively designed and manufactured.

The case joins a growing litigation being pursued against multiple manufacturers involving similar problems with various hernia repair products. In addition to other Kugel and Ventralight mesh lawsuits, there are also a number of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits, Atrium C-Qur lawsuits and Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits pending nationwide, leading to the federal court system to establish centralized pre-trial proceedings for litigation involving those products.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




2 Comments


Doris
I have been living in pure hell !!! I have had 6 surgeries trying to repair my hernia started in 2014 through 2018 by 2 different surgeon’s who tried different mesh’s and I was told I would never get my life back because of erosion of mesh and I stay in pain 24/7 and neither Doctors will risk another surgery because of so much damage due to mesh and if attempt it could cost me my life

edgar
my old mesh perforated so doctor put strattice mesh but it kept leaking He did a 2nd surgery the following month but it kept leaking for 4 months till I went to NY where they removed the mesh.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A series of case management conferences have been scheduled for hair relaxer litigation throughout 2026, leading up to expected bellwether trials in 2027.
Federal indictments against MLB and NBA players reveal how legalized sports betting has blurred the line between competition and addiction, fueling corruption on the field and lawsuits off it.
A California woman had to undergo brain surgery to remove a tumor she says was caused by Depo-Provera side effects, according to a recently filed lawsuit.