Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A new report suggests that Medtronic failed to adequately inform federal regulators about more than 1,000 adverse event reports linked to its Infuse bone growth product for years, including at least four patient deaths.ย Medtronic Infuse is a bio-engineered bone graft product, which has been promoted as an alternative spinal fusion procedure. The recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) is implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse gaps between the vertebrea, providing an alternative to traditional spinal fusions, where bone is harvested from another area of the body or used from a cadaver. In recent years, a number of serious concerns about problems with Medtronic Infuse have been linked to the product, including instances of bone overgrowth, inflammatory reactions, nerve damage, respiratory compression and other complications, including death. Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More According to a special report published this week by the Minnesota Star Tribune, Medtronic may have known about the risk of Infuse complications for years, and failed to properly report the issues to the FDA. The Star Tribune indicates that the medical device manufacturer shut down a study involving 3,600 individuals in the spring of 2008, but failed to inform the FDA about complications experienced within the 30-day time period required by law. Since the publication of this report, Medtronic has challenged many of the findings in a press release issued the same day, indicating that the information had been unfairly presented. The manufacturer has faced hundreds of Medtronic Infuse lawsuits in recent years, which alleged that the manufacturer sold an unreasonably dangerous and defective product, failing to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with receiving the bone growth product. The FDA only approved Infuse rhBMP-2 for limited use during spinal fusion procedures where the lumbar spine is approached through the front and the product is applied to an absorbable collagen sponge that is placed within an โLT-Cageโ that is implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse the gaps between the vertebrae. However, the product has been widely used off-label during other types of spinal surgery, and many users have reported suffering catastrophic complications due to excessive bone growth around the spine. Medtronic Infuse has been used on more than 1 million patients, according to the manufacturer. The study that is the focus of the Star Tribune article occurred between 2002 and 2006. However, it took the company five years to inform the FDA about the earlier complications reported by doctors during the retrospective chart review (RCR). “Medtronic has acknowledged that at the time the RCR was discontinued back in 2008, it was not properly archived and the information collected was not fully assessed for reportability to the FDA,” the company admitted in its press release. “We have taken a number of steps to update our clinical policies and our training to enhance our reporting practices.” The company claims the article falsely suggests the company was trying to conceal the information. However, the company has a history as a “bad actor” in how it conducts clinical trials and influences medical studies. In 2012, aย congressional investigationย determined that Medtronic paid $210 million to study authors that failed to include data on complications linked to its Infuse bone growth product in their reports. Those authors not only failed to disclose links to Medtronic, but the investigation also determined that Medtronic employees secretly edited and sometimes wrote parts of the studies before they were published, which encouraged the off-label use of Infuse. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bone Graft, Clinical Trials, Medtronic, Medtronic Infuse More Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 Whistleblower Lawsuit Results in $10M Settlement by Medtronic May 30, 2014 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (Posted: yesterday) At least three Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits were filed this week, making it the latest manufacturer to face multiple claims alleging the implants are defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026) Infections After Colonoscopy, ERCP May Result in Lawsuits Over Olympus Scope Problems (Posted: 4 days ago) Patients are developing serious infections after colonoscopy and ERCP procedures, as concerns grow that reusable endoscopes may not be fully sterilized, leading to new lawsuits over contaminated medical devices. MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUIT Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (Posted: 5 days ago) Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis agree with calls to consolidate all Dupixent cancer lawsuits currently spread throughout the federal court system before one judge. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITEnlarged Lymph Nodes Led to Dupixent CTCL Diagnosis, Lawsuit Claims (03/16/2026)Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (03/09/2026)Dupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)
Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (Posted: yesterday) At least three Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits were filed this week, making it the latest manufacturer to face multiple claims alleging the implants are defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)
Infections After Colonoscopy, ERCP May Result in Lawsuits Over Olympus Scope Problems (Posted: 4 days ago) Patients are developing serious infections after colonoscopy and ERCP procedures, as concerns grow that reusable endoscopes may not be fully sterilized, leading to new lawsuits over contaminated medical devices. MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUIT
Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (Posted: 5 days ago) Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis agree with calls to consolidate all Dupixent cancer lawsuits currently spread throughout the federal court system before one judge. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITEnlarged Lymph Nodes Led to Dupixent CTCL Diagnosis, Lawsuit Claims (03/16/2026)Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (03/09/2026)Dupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)