Construction Worker Mesothelioma Lawsuit Results in $8.75M Verdict

A former construction worker diagnosed with mesothelioma from asbestos exposure has been awarded $8.75 million by an Oregon jury. 

David Hoff, of Beaverton, Oregon, won a lawsuit filed against Kaiser Gypsum last week, following a three-week trial. Hoff, 65, accused the company of failing to warn him or protect him from asbestos exposure when he worked with the company’s wallboard products as a construction worker throughout the 1970s.

A Multnomah County Circuit Court jury awarded Hoff and his wife $8.75 million after finding Kaiser Gypsum liable. The jury ordered the company to pay Hoff $4 million for pain and suffering, $750,000 for medical expenses, and awarded his wife, Patricia, an additional $4 million. It is believed to be the largest worker asbestos exposure award in the state’s history.

|
|

During the lawsuit, Hoff claimed that Kaiser Gypsum knew about the risks of asbestos exposure as early as 1965, but failed to protect workers from a spackle-like product that contained asbestos and did not warn them of the potential health risks.

Asbestos has been used in a variety of manufacturing and building industries in prior decades, but most uses in the United States were banned more than 30 years ago due to the risk that it may cause a number of serious and life-threatening ailments, including mesothelioma. The rare form of cancer is often not diagnosed until several decades following exposure to cancer, by which time it is already at a very advanced stage and individuals typically are left with a limited life expectancy.

In 2009, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated that the number of asbestos deaths from mesothelioma were continuing to rise, but were expected to have peaked by now as more time passes since the substance was banned.

Asbestos exposure lawsuits have been one of the largest mass-torts in U.S. history, with more than 600,000 people having filed a case against more than 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed with mesothelioma or other related injuries that were allegedly caused by inhaling asbestos fibers.

While mesothelioma lawsuits have traditionally been filed by individuals who worked with asbestos-containing products, an increasing number of secondary exposure mesothelioma cases have been brought in recent years on behalf of spouses, children and other family members who developed the disease after breathing asbestos fibers brought home in the hair or on the clothing of individuals who worked directly with the material.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A multi-plaintiff product liability lawsuit accuses Hologic of knowingly marketing its defective, and now recalled BioZorb implant to breast cancer survivors.
A hair dye lawsuit filed by a salon stylist who worked with the chemicals for 50 years accuses cosmetics companies of failing to warn cosmetologists of the bladder cancer risks.
A Wisconsin woman has filed a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, alleging that she continued using the birth control injection for years after her diagnosis due to the manufacturers’ failure to provide adequate warnings about the potential risk of developing a meningioma.