Johnson & Johnson Cleared of Liability in Ovarian Cancer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Talcum Powder

A Georgia jury has returned a defense verdict in favor or Johnson & Johnson, after finding that the company was not liable for the death of a woman diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using talcum powder products twice daily for decades.

Johnson & Johnson currently faces more than 30,000 Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits brought by women throughout the U.S. court system, each involving similar allegations that talc and asbestos particles in the products caused them to develop ovarian cancer and other health problems.

The family of Margie Evans filed an ovarian cancer wrongful death lawsuit over talcum powder in Georgia state court, pursuing damages from Johnson & Johnson and PTI Royston, the company’s bottler. According to testimony presented at trial, Evans applied Johnson & Johnson talc-based powders for 56 years, by putting it in her underwear and all over her body, following years of marketing by the company that it helps keep women “fresh.”

Learn More About

Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Talcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

Following a three-week trial, a jury in Richmond County, Georgia found in favor of the defendants on Tuesday, indicating that the plaintiff failed to establish that either company was liable for Evans death.

The verdict represents a rare win for Johnson & Johnson, which has previously been hit with a number of massive verdicts in prior cases that went to trial, with juries awarding billions in damages to women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, mesothelioma and other injuries after years of using Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower-to-Shower or other talc-based products for feminine hygiene purposes. However, since the manufacturer has failed to negotiate talcum powder settlements to resolve large numbers of cases, individual cases will continue to go before juries and Johnson & Johnson will have to defend the safety of its products in each trial.

Most of the U.S. talc litigation is currently pending in the federal court system, where the cases are centralized before U.S. District Judge Freda L. Wolfson in the District of New Jersey, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

Judge Wolfson indicated in July that the first federal talcum powder trial will begin in April 2022, which will be the first in a series of “bellwether” cases designed to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be admissible in the federal court system.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

$1.1 Billion Philips CPAP Settlement Reached to Resolve Cancer, Personal Injury Claims
$1.1 Billion Philips CPAP Settlement Reached to Resolve Cancer, Personal Injury Claims (Posted today)

Philips has agreed to pay $1.1 billion to resolve all Philips CPAP personal injury and medical monitoring lawsuits after receiving final approval on another deal to resolve class action economic loss claims as well.

Lawyers Urge Talcum Powder MDL Judge To Reconsider Decision Requiring Full Refiling of Daubert Challenges
Lawyers Urge Talcum Powder MDL Judge To Reconsider Decision Requiring Full Refiling of Daubert Challenges (Posted today)

The U.S. District Judge overseeing talcum powder cancer lawsuits has been asked by plaintiffs to reconsider a ruling last month to allow a second set round of hearings to examine the applicability of expert testimony, which they say would further delay the litigation.