Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Philips DreamStation CPAP Recall Delays Should Result in Strong FDA Enforcement Action, Including Potential Criminal Charges: LawmakerSenator Richard Blumnenthal called for swift and aggressive actions, if reports are true that problems with Philips Dreamstation CPAP machines were known years before a massive recall was issued October 25, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA U.S. Senator is calling for a criminal investigation into the massive Philips DreamStation CPAP recall of 2021, after recent reports revealed that the manufacturer may have known about problems with sound abatement foam inside the machines for years before the devices were pulled from the market.Senator Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut, called for โimmediate actionโ against Philips Respironics in an October 10 letter (PDF) to U.S. Food and Drug Administrator Robert Califf, and Attorney General Merrick Garland at the Department of Justice (DOJ). Blumenthal suggested that criminal charges should be brought against the manufacturer, if the findings are substantiated.The letter came in the wake of a recent ProPublica report which detailed how Philips learned of CPAP sound abatement foam problems as early as 2010, more than a decade before a recall was issued.Philips DreamStation CPAP RecallThe massiveย Philips CPAP DreamStation recall was publicly announced in July 2021, impacting millions of CPAP, BiPAP and mechanical ventilators sold since 2009, which contained a defective polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam that was intended to cut down on noise as the machines were used. However, the manufacturer acknowledged at that time that the foam was known to degrade and breakdown, releasing small black particles, chemicals and toxic gasses directly into the machine’s air pathways.Due to the seriousย health issues from breathing the Philips CPAP foam, consumers were told to immediately stop using their machines unless needed for life supporting treatment.More than two years after the recall, there are now thousands of Philips CPAP lawsuitsย being pursued by former users, each involving allegations that regular users of the machines developed various forms of cancer, respiratory illnesses, lung diseases and other complications after exposure to the foam particles.Stay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreThe recently published ProPublica investigation revealed that Philips began to receive reports of sound abatement foam used in its devices breaking down as early as 2010, but failed to take immediate actions to recall the machines or warn users.In addition to waiting more than a decade before publicly disclosing the issue, the report also found that Philips hid more than 3,700 reports of problems with the CPAP machines from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and that the company’s own scientists had confirmed there was a health risk for users several years before the recall was finally issued.โIt was not until 2019 โ nearly a decade after the first complaints were received โ that Philips finally initiated a formal investigation. It would be two years before Philips would alert FDA that it was recalling the 15 million impacted devices in 2021,โ Blumenthal wrote. โFDA and DOJ must urgently use all of their authorities to protect current and future patients by investigating these allegations thoroughly, taking the strongest enforcement action possible, including criminal charges, if the allegations are substantiated.โThe letter notes that FDA investigations have revealed that Philips sat on more than 220,000 consumer complaints which contained keywords like contaminant, particles, foam, debris, and other clear signs there was a recurring problem with the sound abatement foam. But the company took no corrective or preventative actions for years.โThis delay in action is made even more alarming by the fact that, in 2015, the company received complaints similar to those it had already received in the United States from a subsidiary in Japan. In that case, the subsidiary quickly moved to replace the foam in those breathing machines,โ Blumenthal noted. โOf course, despite this information and action in Japan, Philips continued using the foam in the United States without warning patients or alerting the FDA until 2021.โHe indicated that the public may not know โthe full impact of Philips negligenceโ for years, and urged the FDA and the DOJ to launch swift, aggressive investigations and enforcement actions against the company.October 2023 Philips DreamStation CPAP Recall Lawsuit Status UpdatePhilips recently agreed to pay at least $445 million to settle class action lawsuits over the CPAP recall. However, the deal does not resolve any of the liability the company faces from personal injury lawsuits brought overย side effects of CPAP foam exposure, which has been linked to reports of cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, sarcoidosis and other disease. Company officials have said they hope to reach a settlement resolving those cases next year.Throughout the rest of 2023, the number of claims is expected to continue growing, both involving injuries diagnosed long before the recall, as well as new injuries that continue to be diagnosed months after users breathed the toxic particles released as the sound abatement foam degraded inside their machines.As part of the coordinated management of litigation the company is facing, aย Philips CPAP lawsuit bellwether processย is expected to be established, where small groups of representative claims will be prepared for early trial dates if Philips CPAP settlements can not be reached to resolve large numbers of claims.While the outcome of these early verdicts will not have any binding impact on other plaintiffs, the average Philips CPAP lawsuit payout amounts awarded by juries are likely to have a big influence on how much the manufacturer will pay to settle claims, to avoid each claim being remanded to different U.S. District Courts nationwide for separate trial dates in the future. However, a settlement agreement reached before then may make such trials unnecessary. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Congress, CPAP, CPAP Recall, Justice Department, Philips, RespiratoryMore Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 CommentsURLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: today)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: today)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)