Settlement for Recalled Neutrogena, Aveeno Sunscreen Granted Preliminary Approval

A federal judge has granted preliminary approval for a Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen settlement, which would resolve a class action lawsuit filed over the presence of cancer-causing chemicals found in several aerosol spray versions of the products.

Johnson & Johnson issued a massive sunscreen recall last year, after a report released by the on-line testing pharmacy Valisure found that samples of Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen contained dangerous levels of benzene, a chemical classified as a human carcinogen.

In the wake of the recall, a number of sunscreen class action lawsuits were filed throughout the federal court system, seeking damages for consumers who purchased the products.

In October, the parties reached a settlement intended to resolve at least eight lawsuits, each raising similar allegations and claims. The lawsuits over benzene contamination have been centralized for coordinated management as part of a federal MDL, or multidistrict litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

In a court order (PDF) issued on March 28, U.S. District Judge Raag Singhal granted preliminary approval of the class action settlement, and scheduled a final approval hearing for August 12.

While the details have not been publicly released, a report by Bloomberg Law indicates the settlement includes an agreement by Johnson & Johnson to provide full cash refunds for those with recalled Neutrogena and Aveeno aersol sunscreen products. It would also provide up to $1.75 million in vouchers for consumers who bought non-aerosol Neutrogena and Aveeno products which were not recalled.

In addition, Johnson & Johnson will order external manufacturers to stop using isobutane, a propellant in its aerosol sunscreen products, and will require new testing protocols for its products before they are placed on the market.

Benzene is an industrial chemical that has long been linked to fatal forms of leukemia and other cancers. The FDA considers it a solvent which should not be used in drug products, if avoidable. However, if benzene is not avoidable, it should be restricted to 2 parts per million (ppm), FDA regulations state.

Long-term side effects of benzene exposure have been proven to cause anemia, which is a condition that develops when your blood lacks enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin. Essentially, the chemical causes bone marrow not to produce enough red blood cells, which can damage an individual’s immune system. Federal regulators have determined long-term exposure to benzene can significantly impact blood cells, to the extent it causes cancer such as leukemia, a cancer of the blood-forming organs.

In addition to the class action claims seeking refunds, Johnson & Johnson is expected to face a number of sunscreen cancer lawsuits brought on behalf of consumers who developed various forms of blood cancers following regular use of recalled Neutrogena or Aveeno products, including Acute Myeloid Leukema (AML), Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL), Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDL), Myelofibrosis and Myeloid Metaplasia, Aplastic Anemia and Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A group of women are pursuing a BioZorb breast implant lawsuit against the product’s manufacturer, saying the implant was defectively designed and failed to carry adequate warnings about the risks.
A Walmart pressure cooker lawsuit claims the safety features failed to prevent the lid from being removed while under pressure, leading to an explosion and burn injuries.