Uloric for Gout Resulted in Congestive Heart Failure: Lawsuit

|

A recently filed product liability lawsuit alleges Takeda Pharmaceuticals knew about the heart failure risks from use of Uloric for gout treatment, yet withheld information from patients and the medical community.

Glen Cepak filed the complaint (PDF) late last month in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, indicating the drug maker placed hundreds of thousands of lives at risk by selling Uloric without adequate label warnings.

According to the lawsuit, Cepak had Uloric prescribed for treatment of gout 2016, indicating exposure to the medication caused him to suffer a heart attack in February 2017, and develop congestive heart failure.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Uloric (febuxostat) was introduced by Takeda Pharmaceuticals in 2009, as a prescription medication intended to lower the blood uric levels among adults diagnosed with gout.

Amid aggressive marketing, the drug rapidly became a blockbuster treatment over the past 10 years. However, growing evidence has emerged in recent years which established aย link between Uloric and cardiovascular problems, leading the FDA to require new heart warnings last year.

In February 2019, the FDA announced the drug must carry the strongest label warning the agency can require a drug maker to place on their product, adding aย Uloric โ€œblack boxโ€ warningย about the risk of cardiovascular side effects, which was not adequately reflected by the drug maker in the past.

โ€œDefendants ignored reports from patients and health care providers throughout the United States of Uloricโ€™s failure to perform as intended, which led to the severe and debilitating injuries suffered by Plaintiff, and numerous other patients,โ€ Cepakโ€™s lawsuit states. โ€œRather than doing adequate testing to determine the cause of these injuries or rule out Uloricโ€™s design as the cause of the injuries, Defendants continued to market Uloric as a safer and more effective prescription drug as compared to other available alternative treatment for hyperuricemia and gout.โ€

Cepakโ€™s lawsuit presents claims of strict liability and negligence, and seeks damages for severe physical pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, medical costs, wage loss and loss of future earning capacity.

Although some critics have called for aย Uloric recallย to be issued, the FDA decided to allow the drug to remain on the market, with severe limitations on its approved uses.

Cepak’s case is one of a growing number of Uloric lawsuitsย being pursued by individuals throughout the U.S., each raising similar allegations that strokes and other heart problems may have been avoided if Takeda had provided earlier warnings about the risks associated with the gout treatment.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications.
A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer.