Zantac Use Led To Multiple Surgeries In Fight Against Bladder Cancer, Lawsuit Claims

A Pennsylvania man indicates he was exposed to โ€œunacceptableโ€ levels of a toxic chemical byproduct for 10 years, due to the side effects of Zantac; a recalled heartburn drug he says led to the development of bladder cancer.

Ethan Cowles filed a complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 9, indicating that the active pharmaceutical ingredient ranitidine is inherently unstable and converts to high levels of the known carcinogen N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA); which directly resulted in his cancer diagnosis.

โ€œZantac (chemically known as ranitidine), the popular antacid medication used by millions of people every day, produces staggering amounts of NDMA when it is digested by the human body,โ€ Cowlesโ€™ lawsuit notes. โ€œThe U.S. Food and Drug Administrationโ€™s (FDA) allowable daily limit of NDMA is 92 ng (nanograms). In a single dose of Zantac, researchers are discovering levels in excess of 3 million ng per day in some cases.โ€

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

According to the lawsuit, Cowles began using over-the-counter Zantac in 2010, taking 150 mg per day through 2019. As a result of exposure to NDMA produced by ranitidine, Cowles indicates that he was diagnosed with bladder cancer in 2018, and required at least three surgical procedures. As a result of the injury, he also has to undergo continuing medical monitoring in the future.

Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Chattem. Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. are named as defendants in the lawsuit, which claims they withheld information about the potential link between Zantac and cancer from consumers, regulators and the U.S. medical community.

Zantac has been marketed for decades as a safe and effective treatment for heartburn, without any warnings that users may be exposed to a cancer risk. However, after independent researchers discovered the problems late last year, Zantac recallsย have been issued for most versions of the drug.

The case joins a growing number of similarย Zantac lawsuitsย filed throughout the U.S. court system, alleging that long-term users developed stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer and other injuries.

NDMA used to be a chemical byproduct of making rocket fuel in the early 1990s. However, today, its only use is to cause cancer in animals as part of laboratory experiments.

Asย Zantac recall lawyersย continue to review and file claims in the coming weeks and months, it is expected that tens of thousands of claims will be filed by individuals throughout the U.S.

To deal with the increasing complaints being filed throughout the federal court system, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation recently ordered all Zantac claims be centralized and consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where the litigation will be overseen by U.S. District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg during coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.