FDA Agrees to Limit Phthalates in Certain Food Products In Response to Citizen Petition

With a growing body of scientific evidence that links phthalate exposure to neurological, hormonal and organ disruption, federal health officials have agreed to place some limits on use of the chemicals called for in citizens petitions, but has refused to enact a full phthalate ban in the United States.

In an update released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 19, the agency rejected two petitions banning the use of nine potentially harmful phthalates in food packaging, stating additional information regarding the toxicology of the chemicals would be needed to warrant a ban. However, the agency indicates it will revoke food contact uses of 23 phthalates and two other substances used as plasticizers, adhesives, defoaming agents, surface lubricants, resins, and slimicides. This FDAโ€™s action removes these phthalatesโ€ฏfrom the list of substances authorized by its regulations in 21 CFRโ€ฏparts 175 through 178.

Phthalates include a group of chemicals used to help make plastic flexible or more durable. They are commonly used as part of the packaging, preparation, storage and processing of food products, but are also found in a wide range of other items, including toys, cosmetics, detergents, PVC tubing, medical devices, and pill coatings.

The chemicals are known to disrupt hormones and affect human health. Phthalate side effects have been linked to reproductive problems, increasing a womanโ€™s chance ofย fibroids and endometriosisย andย miscarriage. Studies have also linked the chemicals toย lower IQ in childrenย if exposed during pregnancy, as well asย reduced male fertility.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The FDAโ€™s statement released last week was in response to three separate petitions filed by several health and environmental groups seeking to ban the use of dozens of phthalates from being used in food packaging, after recent studies have shown the chemicals can be released into consumers food; allowing the chemicals to directly enter the bloodstream.

While the ruling to remove authorizations of the 23 phthalates from food uses was seen as a step forward, the agency publicly recognized that the chemicals have largely been abandoned by the food packaging industry already. The decision to remove the authorizations was in response to a citizen’s petition filed by the Flexible Vinyl Alliance in November 2018.

However, the announcement declined two petitions collectively filed by several consumer groups that included the Environmental Defense Fund, the Center for Environmental Health, the Learning Disabilities Association of America, and the Center for Food Safety. Their petitions, which were first filed in 2016, called to collectively ban all phthalates from food packaging, along with supporting research indicating the potential health risks.

The FDA stated the petitions to ban an additional nine phthalates currently authorized for contact uses with food โ€œdid not demonstrate through scientific data or information that these actions are warranted.โ€

Although the FDA declined the ban on additional phthalates, the agency issued a request for information seeking available use and safety information on the remaining phthalates authorized for use in food contact applications. Specifically, the FDA is requesting โ€œscientific data and information on the specific current food contact uses, use levels, dietary exposure, and safety data for the remaining eight phthalates that are still authorized for use as plasticizers in food contact applications after todayโ€™s action on the food additive petition based on abandonment.โ€

Phthalate Exposure Concerns

Phthalates food supply contaminationย often occurs when food contacts certain materials. This can occur during industrialized production, but it can even enter the food supply when preparers wearing rubber gloves handle food.

In August, theย โ€œPreventing Harmful Exposure to Phthalates Actโ€ (PDF), was introduced in the U.S. House and Senate. It seeks to prevent phthalates from contaminating the U.S. food supply. If passed, the bill would ban the use of phthalates in any material that comes in physical contact with food, and would require any materials replacing phthalates currently in use be proven safe.

Health risks from phthalates may includeย high blood pressure, increased risk ofย obesity and diabetes, and increased risk ofย allergic reaction and asthmaย in children exposed during pregnancy.

Other studies have shown phthalates are potent endocrine disruptors which affect the function of hormones, includingย thyroid hormones, increased risk ofย miscarriage, and reducedย male fertility, even forย generations after initial exposure.

Russell Maas
Written by: Russell Maas

Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist

Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโ€™s leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโ€™s editorial strategy, including SEO and content development.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

The second Bard PowerPort bellwether trial is now scheduled to begin in August after the plaintiff in a claim originally planned for trial next month died, and her family stopped pursuing litigation.
A Delaware woman has filed a Dupixent lawsuit, claiming manufacturers promoted the eczema drug as a breakthrough treatment while failing to warn that it may trigger or worsen CTCL, a rare form of non-Hodgkinโ€™s lymphoma.
Federal regulators have expanded an Omnipod recall after reports that internal tubing defects may cause insulin leaks and under-delivery, potentially triggering dangerous blood sugar spikes.