Ninja Foodie Lawsuit Filed After Pressure Cooker Lid Exploded Off, Causing Burn Injuries

A California man has filed a product liability lawsuit after a Ninja Food pressure cooker lid exploded off while the contents were still pressurized, showering him with scalding hot liquid that cause severe and painful burn injuries.

The complaint (PDF) filed by Hayde Guevara in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California on January 25, pursuing claims against SharkNinja Operating, LLC, as the defendant, over design problems with the “Ninja Foodie” pressure cooker.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Guevara claims that on February 2, 2020, the lid of his Ninja Foodie unexpectedly exploded off of the top of the device during normal use. This caused the pressurized food cooking inside the device to spray out forcefully, covering Guevara with the boiling hot contents of the pressure cooker, which the Ninja Foodie lawsuit blames on known design defects.

โ€œDefendant SharkNinjaโ€™s pressure cookers possess defects that make them unreasonably dangerous for their intended use by consumers because the lid can be rotated and opened while the unit remains pressurized,โ€ the lawsuit states. โ€œFurther, Defendant SharkNinjaโ€™s representations about โ€˜safetyโ€™ are not just misleading, they are flatly wrong, and put innocent consumers like Plaintiff directly in harmโ€™s way.โ€

Guevara presents claims of strict product liability, negligent products liability, and breach of implied warranty.

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits Over Safety Feature Failures

The case joins dozens of similarย pressure cooker lawsuitsย filed in recent months, each raising allegations about unreasonably dangerous designs and defective safety features on several modern devices, including Ninja Foodi, Instant Pot, Crock-Pot and other brands.

Most of the accidents involve severe pressure cooker burn injuries which occurred after the lid was removed while the contents are still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the userโ€™s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.

As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area.

Most recently, a massiveย Crock-Pot recallย was issued in November 2020, impacting nearly 1 million 6-Quart Express Crock Multi-Cookers with lid locking defects, after at least 99 burn injuries were reported.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




1 Comments


Vianca
I was burned in the same exact way. 2nd degree burns down my whole thigh

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuit alleges Olympus failed to address known problems with sterilizing duodenoscopes, leading to a fatal ERCP infection years after federal regulators first raised concerns about the devices.
Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.