Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
NuvaRing Lawsuit Dismissal Due to Statute of Limitations in NJ Upheld August 9, 2012 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments A New Jersey appeals court has upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit over blood clots caused by NuvaRing side effects, finding that the plaintiff failed to file the case within the applicable statute of limitations based on when she learned that her injury may have been caused by the birth control ring. In an opinion (PDF) issued on August 1, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a lower court’s decision to grant summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by Stephanie Millian, who alleges that use of NuvaRing caused her to suffer a blood clot in her left leg, known as a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which led to a pulmonary embolism when it caused a blockage of a blood vessel in her lungs. Every legal claim has an applicable statute of limitations, or deadline, which requires that a lawsuit be filed within a certain amount of time. Learn More About Paragard Lawsuits Women have reported problems where Paragard IUD fractured or broken during removal, resulting in serious injury. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Paragard Lawsuits Women have reported problems where Paragard IUD fractured or broken during removal, resulting in serious injury. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Under New Jersey law, a plaintiff must file their lawsuit with two years from the date an injury was suffered as a result of a wrongful act or omission of the defendant. However, there is an exception to this deadline under the New Jersey discovery rule, which allows additional time when the relationship between the injury and the defendant’s conduct is not evident, causing the two year limitation period to begin on the date when a “reasonable person” in the plaintiff’s position would have been aware of the defendant’s fault. NuvaRing Statute of Limitations Began At Discovery of Potential Cause of Blood Clot In this case, Millian acknowledged that while she was hospitalized with the injury, her treating physician told her that NuvaRing was the primary cause of her blood clot. In addition, the plaintiff’s mother contacted Organon Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturers of NuvaRing, while Millian was hospitalized to inquire about whether there were a lot of other such cases involving blood clots with NuvaRing use. The New Jersey appellate court determined that Millian was aware of facts that should have alerted her to the possibility that the makers of NuvaRing caused her injuries before she was discharged from the hospital. However, Millian’s NuvaRing lawsuit was not filed until two years and two weeks after her release from the hospital. Millian argued on appeal that she did not retain counsel or file her lawsuit earlier because she was not aware of her right to file the case until she read an article more than two years after her injury that discussed other NuvaRing lawsuits that had been filed. However, the appeals court rejected this argument, indicating that the issue was not whether she believed she could file a lawsuit, but whether a “reasonable person” could have discovered a basis for a claim with the exercise of “ordinary diligence.” While the opinion only results in the dismissal of this case, other NuvaRing lawsuits that are subject to the New Jersey statute of limitations may be impacted by the decision if their complaint is filed more than two years after they first discover that their blood clot injury may have been caused by side effects of NuvaRing. NuvaRing Lawsuits Over Blood Clots Moving Forward in New Jersey and MDL There are currently at least 166 NuvaRing lawsuits pending in New Jersey state court. In addition, an estimated 900 additional cases are pending in the federal court system, where the litigation has been consolidated for pretrial proceedings as part of a NuraRing MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. NuvaRing is a form of birth control that releases a combination of hormones through a ring that is inserted into the vagina once a month. The ring releases estrogen ethinyl estradiol, which is contained in many forms of birth control, and a “third-generation” progestin, known as etonogestrel, which has been linked to an increased risk of blood clots and thrombotic events, such as pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, stroke and sudden death. Since it was introduced in 2001, NuvaRing has been heavily promoted in direct-to-consumer advertisements, particularly targeting young women, as a “hassel-free” form of birth control, which is inserted into the vagina once a month. However, research has suggested that NuvaRing increases the risk of blood clots when compared to some older birth control pills. Lawsuits allege that Organon Pharmaceuticals, which originally developed and sold the drug before being acquired by Schering-Plough and later merged with Merck, failed to adequately research the birth control ring or warn about the potential side effects. First NuvaRing trial dates in the country are expected to begin in early February 2013 in New Jersey state court. In addition, a number of test cases, known as “bellwether” lawsuits are being prepared for trial dates in the federal MDL, which are expected to begin early next year as well. These early trial dates often help the parties gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence, arguments and testimony that will be repeated throughout many other cases. Therefore, the outcomes may help facilitate a potential NuvaRing settlement agreement in the litigation. Tags: Birth Control, Birth Control Ring, Blood Clot, Deep Vein Thrombosis, NuvaRing, Organon, Pulmonary Embolism More NuvaRing Lawsuit Stories Sustiva Side Effects May Reduce Nuvaring Effectiveness: Study March 12, 2018 NuvaRing Warnings Issued for Women Over 35 Who Smoke August 4, 2014 NuvaRing Settlement to Move Forward for 3,800 Plaintiffs June 9, 2014 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermFacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025) Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (Posted: 2 days ago) Roblox is facing a lawsuit from a Georgia mother who alleges the platform’s failure to implement adequate child safety measures allowed online predators to groom her young son. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITRoblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025)Roblox Sexual Exploitation Lawsuit Alleges 10 Year Old Girl Coerced Into Sending Explicit Images for Robux (08/25/2025) MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) Hearings over the validity of expert witnesses in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits will begin on April 1, 2026, when plaintiffs’ experts must convince the judge that their testimony linking the products to cancer is scientifically reliable enough to be presented to juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITUterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study (07/08/2025)Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (07/03/2025)Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (Posted: 2 days ago) Roblox is facing a lawsuit from a Georgia mother who alleges the platform’s failure to implement adequate child safety measures allowed online predators to groom her young son. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITRoblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025)Roblox Sexual Exploitation Lawsuit Alleges 10 Year Old Girl Coerced Into Sending Explicit Images for Robux (08/25/2025)
MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 (Posted: 3 days ago) Hearings over the validity of expert witnesses in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits will begin on April 1, 2026, when plaintiffs’ experts must convince the judge that their testimony linking the products to cancer is scientifically reliable enough to be presented to juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITUterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study (07/08/2025)Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (07/03/2025)Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)