Public Citizen Criticizes Proposed FDA Opioid Surveillance Plan

A prominent consumer advocacy group is criticizing an opioid surveillance plan proposed by federal regulators, indicating that it lacks major oversights and has questionable ties to Purdue Pharma and other opioid drug makers.

Public Citizen submitted scathing public comments (PDF) on December 18, aimed at the details of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed opioid surveillance plan that designates public funds for the Research Abuse, Diversion and Addiction-Related Surveillance program (RADARS), which has long-standing ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

The group accuses the FDA of providing vague details concerning the opioid surveillance plan and questionable practices when allocating public funds for the new program.

The response criticizes the FDAโ€™s intent to direct opioid surveillance public funds to the RADARS program since it is โ€œexcessively influenced by Purdue Pharmaceuticals and other opioid manufacturers,โ€ according to the letter. The response also questions the FDAโ€™s intent to direct funds for research solely to RADARS.

The FDAโ€™s plan does not indicate any other surveillance efforts will be involved in the program and does not direct funds to other drug intervention programs, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or National Institute of Drug Abuse.

Suboxone Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay and Tooth Loss
Suboxone Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay and Tooth Loss

Pharmaceutical Industry Participation in RADARS

RADARS was originally formed by Purdue and supports โ€œquestionable lobbying efforts by the opioid industryโ€, Public Citizen notes.

Among the eight-member RADARS advisory board, two reported taking more than $580,000 in pharmaceutical industry financial payments from 2016 to 2022, and three members received payments of $1,100 in at least one year from 2016 to 2022.

The Public Citizen letter cites a complaint filed by the Colorado Attorney General against Purdue and the Sackler family, noting their habit of blurring Purdue’s interests with RADARS efforts and other opioid manufacturer interests.

Opioid Surveillance Plan Inadequacies

The letter also condemns the FDAโ€™s plan to compile data from patients in opioid treatment, claiming the agency is ignoring that most people who need addiction treatment do not receive it. In addition, some people affected by opioid poisoning have no history of abuse or dependence. Thus, data from a large portion of the intended population will be missing from the agencyโ€™s research.

Essentially, the lack of inclusion of populations who need treatment is another tactic by the FDA to blame patients for their addiction, according to Public Citizen.

The letter also blasts the FDA for failing to recognize the agencyโ€™s own part, as well as that of the opioid industry and doctor overprescribing, in bearing โ€œsubstantial responsibilityโ€ for the origins of the opioid epidemic.

The FDAโ€™s plan was published in the Federal Register on October 17, 2023, and public comment on the plan closed on December 18, 2023. The FDA will review public comments along with recommendations from industry experts before issuing a final regulation regarding the surveillance plan.

The surveillance plan is one of the FDAโ€™s efforts to address the ongoing opioid epidemic, which also includes the agencyโ€™s announcement last month implementing mandatory warning labels for all opioid painkillers.

Martha Garcia
Written by: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.




1 Comments


Deprived
The only thing this opioid chrisis is doing is keeping people from getting there meds, the fentynal is killing everyone not the pain meds prescribed by Dr which happens to be an opioid..

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโ€™s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.