Suave Lawsuits Over Benzene in Antiperspirant Spray Cleared to Move Forward by Federal Judge

|

A federal judge has cleared the way for lawsuits to move forward over Suave antiperspirant spray contaminated with high levels of benzene, a known cancer-causing agent.

The Suave lawsuits were filed after the release of a report by the independent online pharmacy Valisure on November 3, which found dangerously high levels of benzene in deodorants and body sprays including Suave, Old Spice, Secret and Tag. Shortly after the report was released, the organization also filed a citizen’s petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, calling for a deodorant recall of the affected products.

Benzene is an industrial chemical that has been associated with the development of several fatal forms of cancer, leukemia and other conditions, such as AML, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL), Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDL), Myelofibrosis and Myeloid Metaplasia, Aplastic Anemia and Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

For the last couple years, Valisure has focused on revealing hidden, potentially dangerous, chemicals sold in consumer goods. In addition to deodorant and body spray products, Valisure has also found evidence of benzene in various aerosol spray sunscreen products, including Neutrogena, Coppertone and others. Those manufacturers also face a number of sunscreen lymphoma lawsuits being filed by former users who applied large amounts on a regular and consistent basis.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

In a memorandum opinion and order (PDF) regarding two of those lawsuits; one filed by Antonio Morris, and another filed jointly by Yvonne Barnes and Patricia Dean, U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly of the Northern District of Illinois, rejected petitions by Unilever to have the cases dismissed.

All three plaintiffs are from Illinois and both lawsuits seek class action status, alleging consumers were misled by about the safety of the products. The lawsuits indicate Unilever, the manufacturer, never warned consumers they were at risk of benzene exposure and seek to represent consumers who purchased contaminated deodorant nationwide.

Unilever tried to have the court cases thrown out based on lack of standing, arguing that the plaintiffs had not alleged an actual injury. However, Judge Kennelly disagreed, pointing to Barnes’ claims as an example.

“Barnes does not allege a present physical injury from the use of the Suave products, but that is not required – an economic injury may suffice, “Judge Kennelly wrote. “Barnes alleges that she was deprived of the benefit of her bargain, in that she would not have purchased the products, or would not have purchased them for the listed price, had she known they contained a human carcinogen.”

Judge Kennelly indicated that is a sufficient allegation of injury. However, he declined to rule on a call by Unilever to bar punitive damages in the lawsuits, saying the Court can decide that at a later date. Judge Kennelly also agreed to dismiss some of the plaintiffs’ claims, but denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the cases entirely.

In addition to lawsuits against Suave, there are also a number of similar Old Spice lawsuits filed after the discovery of benzene in that spray deodorant product last year, which also seek class action status to bring compensation benefits to consumers nationwide.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation. As complication reports rise and more women undergo revision surgery, lawsuits are now being investigated against companies that promoted mesh for off-label breast procedures despite FDA warnings and no breast-specific safety data.
A panel of federal judges will decide in December whether to consolidate all claims brought by parents who allege that Roblox facilitated child sexual exploitation into a multidistrict litigation.
A federal judge has called for a second census of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits and will require prompt filing of census forms for claims filed from October 1 forward.