Johnson & Johnson Sets Aside $2.1B To Cover Talcum Powder Verdict, As Appeal Options Narrow

With the highest court in Missouri rejecting an appeal by Johnson & Johnson to overturn a $2.12 billion talcum powder verdict, the manufacturer has set aside a reserve to cover the judgment while it pursues a last ditch request for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

On Tuesday, the Missouri Supreme Court refused to review a decision returned by the state’s intermediate appeals court in June, which upheld a verdict in favor of 22 women who alleged that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn about the link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer.

Johnson & Johnson currently faces nearly 20,000 Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits filed by women nationwide in state and federal courts, each involving similar allegations that exposure to talc and asbestos particles contained in the popular products resulted in the development of ovarian cancer and other injuries.

|
|

In July 2018, a Missouri state court jury awarded a staggering $4.7 billion in damages to a group of women, finding that evidence presented at trial established Johnson & Johnson has known for decades that applying the popular talcum powder around the genitals may increase the risk of cancer, yet failed to warn consumers.

Although Johnson & Johnson has maintained the trial was flawed and the verdict would be overturned, a panel of judges with the Missouri Court of Appeals rejected the manufacturer’s arguments this summer, and upheld an award of $500 million in compensatory damages, plus another $1.62 billion in punitive damages designed to punish the reckless failure to warn about the talcum powder risks.

After the Missouri Supreme Court rejected the further appeal, Johnson & Johnson officials indicate the company will file a petition for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, which is widely considered to be a long-shot final appeal option to avoid paying the verdict.

According to Reuters News, Johnson & Johnson is now setting aside a $2.1 billion reserve for the verdict, which will be reflected in the company’s year-end financial reports.

After failing to defend the safety of their product in multiple trials and appeals, Johnson & Johnson is likely to face increasing pressure to negotiate talcum powder settlements for other women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, to avoid a number of cases that are being prepared for trial.

In May 2020, Johnson & Johnson announced it was removing talc-based Baby Powder from the market in North America, leading to speculation that the move was designed to limit liability in the future.

Analysts have suggested that resolving the entire litigation could cost Johnson & Johnson $10 billion.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A panel of federal judges will decide in December whether to consolidate all claims brought by parents who allege that Roblox facilitated child sexual exploitation into a multidistrict litigation.
A federal judge has called for a second census of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits and will require prompt filing of census forms for claims filed from October 1 forward.
Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm.