Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Judge Awards $120 Million in Damages for Cancer from Johnson’s Baby Powder November 23, 2020 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAfter a New York jury determined last year that Johnson & Johnson should pay $325 million to a woman diagnosed with cancer from Johnson’s Baby Powder, a state court judge has agreed to reduce the award. However, the manufacturer still owes $120 million in damages for failing to warn about the risks associated with their product.The verdict comes in a talcum powder asbestos lawsuit brought by Donna Olson and her husband, Robert, which alleged that regular exposure to toxic particles in Johnson’s Baby Powder caused her develop a rare and deadly form of cancer known as mesothelioma.In June 2019, a jury awarded $25 million in compensatory damages to the couple, with an additional $300 million in punitive damages added during a second phase of the trial to punish the company for disregarding the health and safety of consumers.Learn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLearn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe verdict marked the first time since the 1980s that a jury in New York’s “asbestos court” awarded punitive damages, which are generally rare and reserved for particularly reprehensible conduct by defendants.According to evidence presented at the trial, Olson developed mesothelioma from asbestos contained in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder, which she regularly breathed in while applying the products from the time she was about eight years old, until at least 1984.Mesothelioma has a very long latency period, and it is often decades after exposure to asbestos particles that the cancer is diagnosed. By that time, the disease is often at a very advanced stage, with few treatment options.Following post-trial motions, New York Supreme Court Judge Gerald Lebovits recently determined that the original jury awards should be reduced to $15 million in compensatory damages and $105 million in punitive damages, giving the plaintiff the option of accepting the new award or having another trial on damages only.According to a report by Law.com, attorneys for the Olsons indicate that the reduction will be accepted by the plaintiffs. However, Johnson & Johnson has maintained that it still intends to appeal the verdict to a higher court.Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder VerdictsThe case is the latest in a series of massive verdicts returned in talcum powder claims that have gone to trial nationwide, and Johnson & Johnson has been unable to establish that it can reliably defend the safety of its widely used Baby Powder before juries or judges.There are currently about 20,000 Johnson’s Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits filed throughout the U.S legal system, with most of the litigation currently pending in federal courts, where Johnson & Johnson is expected to face a series of additional trials in the next few years.The claims involve allegations that consumers developed mesothelioma, as well as ovarian cancer from Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products, indicating that the manufacturer has known for decades about the risks associated with the products, yet failed to warn consumers.In July 2018, a Missouri state court jury awarded a staggering $4.7 billion in damages to a group of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. While an appeals court in the state later reduced that verdict, Johnson & Johnson has still been told that it must pay $500 million in compensatory and $1.62 billion in punitive damages to 22 plaintiffs in the case, and the company only has one option remaining to challenge the award, involving a long-shot petition for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.According to a statement issued earlier this month, Johnson & Johnson has set aside $2.1 billion in reserve for the verdict, which will be reflected on the company’s year-end financial results. However, analysis have suggested that the entire litigation could cost the company more than $10 billion.If Johnson & Johnson is unable to establish that it can defend claims at trial or on appeal, it is likely to face mounting pressure to negotiate talcum powder settlements to resolve claims that the product caused cancer. However, the company would still remain liable as prior users are diagnosed with cancer, since they did not remove talc from Johnson’s Baby Powder until May 2020. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Asbestos, Baby Powder, Cancer, Johnson & Johnson, Mesothelioma, Ovarian Cancer, Shower to Shower, Talc, Talcum PowderMore Talcum Powder Lawsuit Stories J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits July 29, 2026 Additional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 March 20, 2026 Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J February 16, 2026 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: today)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026) Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: yesterday)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026) Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 2 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: today)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: yesterday)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)
Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 2 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)