Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Judge Awards $120 Million in Damages for Cancer from Johnson’s Baby Powder November 23, 2020 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAfter a New York jury determined last year that Johnson & Johnson should pay $325 million to a woman diagnosed with cancer from Johnson’s Baby Powder, a state court judge has agreed to reduce the award. However, the manufacturer still owes $120 million in damages for failing to warn about the risks associated with their product.The verdict comes in a talcum powder asbestos lawsuit brought by Donna Olson and her husband, Robert, which alleged that regular exposure to toxic particles in Johnson’s Baby Powder caused her develop a rare and deadly form of cancer known as mesothelioma.In June 2019, a jury awarded $25 million in compensatory damages to the couple, with an additional $300 million in punitive damages added during a second phase of the trial to punish the company for disregarding the health and safety of consumers.Learn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLearn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe verdict marked the first time since the 1980s that a jury in New York’s “asbestos court” awarded punitive damages, which are generally rare and reserved for particularly reprehensible conduct by defendants.According to evidence presented at the trial, Olson developed mesothelioma from asbestos contained in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder, which she regularly breathed in while applying the products from the time she was about eight years old, until at least 1984.Mesothelioma has a very long latency period, and it is often decades after exposure to asbestos particles that the cancer is diagnosed. By that time, the disease is often at a very advanced stage, with few treatment options.Following post-trial motions, New York Supreme Court Judge Gerald Lebovits recently determined that the original jury awards should be reduced to $15 million in compensatory damages and $105 million in punitive damages, giving the plaintiff the option of accepting the new award or having another trial on damages only.According to a report by Law.com, attorneys for the Olsons indicate that the reduction will be accepted by the plaintiffs. However, Johnson & Johnson has maintained that it still intends to appeal the verdict to a higher court.Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder VerdictsThe case is the latest in a series of massive verdicts returned in talcum powder claims that have gone to trial nationwide, and Johnson & Johnson has been unable to establish that it can reliably defend the safety of its widely used Baby Powder before juries or judges.There are currently about 20,000 Johnson’s Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits filed throughout the U.S legal system, with most of the litigation currently pending in federal courts, where Johnson & Johnson is expected to face a series of additional trials in the next few years.The claims involve allegations that consumers developed mesothelioma, as well as ovarian cancer from Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products, indicating that the manufacturer has known for decades about the risks associated with the products, yet failed to warn consumers.In July 2018, a Missouri state court jury awarded a staggering $4.7 billion in damages to a group of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. While an appeals court in the state later reduced that verdict, Johnson & Johnson has still been told that it must pay $500 million in compensatory and $1.62 billion in punitive damages to 22 plaintiffs in the case, and the company only has one option remaining to challenge the award, involving a long-shot petition for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.According to a statement issued earlier this month, Johnson & Johnson has set aside $2.1 billion in reserve for the verdict, which will be reflected on the company’s year-end financial results. However, analysis have suggested that the entire litigation could cost the company more than $10 billion.If Johnson & Johnson is unable to establish that it can defend claims at trial or on appeal, it is likely to face mounting pressure to negotiate talcum powder settlements to resolve claims that the product caused cancer. However, the company would still remain liable as prior users are diagnosed with cancer, since they did not remove talc from Johnson’s Baby Powder until May 2020. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Asbestos, Baby Powder, Cancer, Johnson & Johnson, Mesothelioma, Ovarian Cancer, Shower to Shower, Talc, Talcum PowderMore Talcum Powder Lawsuit Stories Additional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 March 20, 2026 Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J February 16, 2026 Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report January 22, 2026 0 Comments NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: today)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026) Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: 2 days ago)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)
Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report January 22, 2026
Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: today)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: 2 days ago)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)