Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Jury Awards $18.8M in First Talcum Powder Trial After J&J’s Failed Bankruptcy SchemeThe case was being closely watched as parties continue to debate a contentious talcum powder settlement proposal, which has delayed all further trials and may return the litigation to the U.S. bankruptcy system. July 19, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA California jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $18.8 million in damages in the first talcum powder trial to be held since the manufacturer attempted to pursue a controversial bankruptcy scheme, which delayed all progress in thousands of cases until a federal appeals court rejected the filing earlier this year.The lawsuit was filed by Anthony Hernandez Valadez, involving allegations that he developed mesothelioma cancer from asbestos particles in Johnson & Johnsonโs talcum powder products.It is one of more than 40,000 Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits currently being pursued against Johnson & Johnson, and was granted an expedited trial date in California state court since Valadez is facing a grave health prognosis. However, the start of the trial was delayed nearly two years, after Johnson & Johnson attempted to transfer all liability it faces for failing to warn about the risks associated with talcum powder to a new subsidiary, LTL Management, LLC, which then immediately filed for bankruptcy in October 2021.Learn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLearn More AboutTalcum Powder LawsuitsTalcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONJohnson & Johnson initiated the controversial talcum powder bankruptcy scheme after it was hit with a series of massive jury verdicts in cases that went to trial several years ago, which resulted in a lengthy stay on all pending trial dates and progress in the litigation.The move drew immediate criticism from legal experts as an abuse of the U.S. bankruptcy system, since Johnson & Johnson has billions in assets on hand and it was largely viewed as a negotiating tactic to delay trials and force a settlement where plaintiffs are forced to accept minimal value for their claims.Following a lengthy appeals process, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuitย rejected the bankruptcy filingย in January 2023, setting the stage for Valadez’s trial to move forward and active litigation to resume in thousands of other claims this year. However, days after the appeals court rejected a request for rehearing on the original dismissal, Johnson & Johnson initiated a second bankruptcy filing together with a proposed $9 billion talcum powder settlement fund.While Johnson & Johnson argued that the stay on all trials and litigation should continue while the second bankruptcy filing is evaluated by the Courts, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan rejected that request in April 2023. Judge Kaplan did allow some new talcum powder lawsuits to be filed against Johnson & Johnson, and agreed to delay the start of any additional trials for 60 days.The lawsuit filed by Valdez in California state court was specifically allowed to proceed to trial after that delay, since Valadez was suffering from a terminal illness and there were concerns he may not live to see trial if the delays continue. Judge Kaplan ruled that his talcum powder trial could move forward once a California state court judge confirmed it was ready for trial.Jury Hands Down $18.8M Talcum Powder Lawsuit VerdictFollowing a lengthy trial, a California state court jury returned their verdict on Tuesday, determining that Johnson & Johnson is liable for Valadezโs mesothelioma diagnosis and failing health, ordering the company to pay $18.8 million in damages.While the outcome will not have any binding impact on other claims being pursued, it is likely to have a substantial influence on any potential vote on the talcum powder settlement fund proposed by Johnson & Johnson in this second bankruptcy filing, which already faced substantial criticism that it vastly under-values the compensation claimants should receive.Johnson & Johnson has already said it plans to appeal the verdict, alleging that the court did not allow the manufacturerโs attorneys to present evidence suggesting Valadezโs mesothelioma was caused by something else, further delaying justice for Valadez. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Asbestos, Baby Powder, Bankruptcy, California, Cancer, Johnson & Johnson, Mesothelioma, Ovarian Cancer, Shower to Shower, Talcum Powder Image Credit: |More Talcum Powder Lawsuit Stories J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits July 29, 2026 Additional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 March 20, 2026 Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J February 16, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026) FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026) Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026)
Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)